Content
81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean, well-structured, and provides fully executable commands, but it presents only a command menu with no workflow sequence or validation checkpoints for what is inherently a batch/recurring operation. Adding guidance on verifying orders and handling failures would materially improve it.
Suggestions
Add a short workflow section: create an order, confirm it via '/dca list' or '/dca info <id>', then verify fills/balances before walking away.
Include validation/error-recovery guidance (e.g., what to check when an order fails or a platform rejects a recurring buy), since DCA is a batch operation that runs unattended.
Document how intervals and per-order sizes interact with the total budget so users can sanity-check a schedule before starting.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean one-sentence intro plus a command table with no over-explanation of what DCA is or how the platforms work, matching the score-5 anchor "Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence; every token earns its place." | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Commands are fully executable and copy-paste ready with explicit placeholders (e.g. '/dca poly <token-id> <total-$> --per <$> --every <interval>'), matching the score-5 anchor for concrete, executable guidance. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | DCA places recurring orders (a batch operation), but the body is only a command menu with no sequenced workflow and no validation/verification checkpoints; the rubric caps batch skills without validation at 3, and the near-total absence of any step sequence fits the score-2 anchor. | 2 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with a clear intro and a single well-organized Commands section and needs no external references, qualifying for the score-5 simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |