Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is exceptionally lean and actionable with concrete commands and examples, and is well structured for a simple single-purpose skill. Its only meaningful weakness is the absence of validation/verification steps around destructive financial operations.
Suggestions
Add a verification checkpoint after risky operations, e.g. 'After depositing or borrowing, run /kamino health to confirm the position is safe.'
Include a brief recommended workflow sequence (e.g. deposit -> check reserves/rates -> borrow -> monitor health) to clarify multi-step usage.
Note the liquidation risk and recommend checking /kamino health before and after leverage changes.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and command-list driven with no concept padding; the single intro sentence plus grouped command tables and examples means every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready command syntax with placeholders plus real executable examples ('/kamino deposit 100 USDC') and exact configuration exports cover the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Commands are grouped by category but destructive/batch financial operations (deposit, borrow, withdraw, repay) have no validation or verification checkpoints, which caps workflow clarity at 3 per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with well-organized sections (Commands, Examples, Configuration, See Also) and no external references needed, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |