Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is lean and actionable with well-organized command reference tables, but workflows involving destructive leveraged trading lack validation or confirmation checkpoints, capping workflow clarity. Adding safety/verification steps would raise the score.
Suggestions
Add an explicit confirmation or validation step before destructive/batch operations such as '/mx closeall' and high-leverage opens (e.g., 'Confirm position size and leverage before submitting; verify with /mx positions afterward').
Clarify the credential setup workflow with a concrete sequence (set env vars -> verify auth via '/mx balance' -> only then trade) rather than implying it through a quick-start snippet.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean tables and examples with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable command syntax with worked examples, but the authentication/setup flow is only implied via env vars with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Commands are well organized but destructive/batch operations (closeall, leveraged opens) lack validation or confirmation checkpoints; the destructive-skill cap applies. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed; sections are cleanly organized into Quick Start, command categories, Examples, and Notes, satisfying the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |