Content
76%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with concrete commands and examples and is well-structured, but it lacks a sequenced workflow with explicit validation checkpoints for its destructive trading operations.
Suggestions
Add an explicit setup workflow (e.g., 1. add source 2. add filters 3. configure trade params 4. test with `/signal test` 5. enable) with a validation checkpoint before live trading.
De-duplicate the repeated `/signal add rss` example across the Commands, Examples, and Signal Sources sections to tighten token use.
Document a safe-testing / verification path (e.g., paper-trading or dry-run mode) before signals trigger real trades.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean command-reference prose without over-explaining concepts Claude knows, though the same 'add rss' example is repeated across Commands, Examples, and Signal Sources sections and could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready slash commands with inline examples cover the common cases (adding sources, filters, config) plus a concrete webhook JSON payload. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Operations are organized by feature rather than as a sequenced workflow, and because triggering automatic trades is destructive, the absence of explicit pre-trade validation/verification steps caps this at 3 per the rubric. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single file is well-organized with clear section headers and no external bundle files are needed, but at ~100 lines it exceeds the under-50-line exception that would allow a 5 on sections alone. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |