Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise and well-structured with executable command examples and no token waste. Its main weakness is actionability/workflow depth: it describes the command surface but not what an audit returns or how to interpret and act on the results.
Suggestions
Add a brief example invocation with sample output so Claude knows what an audit result looks like.
Document how to interpret key risk indicators (honeypot, rug-pull, risk score) and when to warn the user.
Note any validation step (e.g., verifying the address resolves to a token) before running the audit.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean one-sentence capability summary plus a tight command table with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready slash commands cover the common cases (auto-detect, explicit chain, help), but there is no worked example of an actual audit invocation or sample output, leaving a minor gap versus the fully-covering 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | This simple read-only single-task skill has an unambiguous action surface, but the body does not explain how results are presented or what to do with them, a minor gap below the clean 5 for simple skills. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external references (none exist), the body is well-organized into a title, capability summary, and Commands section, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |