CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

reflect

Review recent work, find repeated workflow patterns, and suggest reusable skills, agents, commands, config changes, or playbooks. Use when the user asks to learn from past sessions, improve recurring workflows, or identify what should be turned into reusable agent instructions.

64

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./src/skills/reflect/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, actionable orchestrator skill with concrete commands, schemas, and templates, plus clear sequencing and error handling. Its main weakness is verbosity from duplicated output formats and a heavy inlined session-archaeology section.

Suggestions

Collapse the two near-duplicate Output Format sections (Session Mode report and general report) into a single parameterized template to remove redundancy.

Move the detailed Session Mode archaeology block (DB queries, JSON schema, report template) into a references/ file and keep SKILL.md as an overview with a one-line pointer.

Add an explicit post-apply verification step to the workflow so recommended config/prompt/agent changes are confirmed to take effect, not just proposed.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Mostly efficient and free of concept-explanation padding, but ~322 lines include near-duplicate output-format sections and repeated asset-type enumerations that could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete executable bun/sqlite queries, a JSON session-summary schema, and report/proposal templates, with only minor gaps (qualitative scoring criteria and an assumed DB path with no fallback).

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear numbered 5-step workflow plus explicit error handling and a propose-before-changing gate give most checkpoints, though a post-apply verification loop for recommended config edits is absent.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist, but the single-file body is well-organized into clearly signaled sections; the large inlined Session Mode block is the main organization gap keeping it from a top score.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

83%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly and explicitly covers both capability and trigger conditions with concrete, natural-language phrasing and a well-scoped niche. It is strong overall, with only minor gaps in synonym coverage and action specificity.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and lists several concrete suggestion forms (skills, agents, commands, config changes, playbooks) alongside review/find/suggest actions, but the core verbs remain somewhat abstract rather than a fully concrete action set.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (review work, find patterns, suggest reusable assets) and when (concrete 'Use when the user asks to...' triggers), matching the comprehensive anchor.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural trigger phrases users would say ('learn from past sessions', 'improve recurring workflows', 'turn into reusable agent instructions'), but misses common synonyms and the /reflect trigger that appears only in the body.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a distinct retrospective asset-creation niche unlikely to fire for ordinary implementation work, with only minor overlap risk against general review/setup skills.

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
alvinunreal/oh-my-opencode-slim
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.