frontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
56
62%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Optimize this skill with Tessl
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/frontend-design/SKILL.mdQuality
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description has a solid structure with an explicit 'Use when' clause and communicates its design-quality focus, which is a differentiator. However, it lacks specific concrete actions beyond 'generates code' and misses many natural trigger terms users would use when requesting frontend work. The scope is broad enough that it could conflict with other web development or coding skills.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions such as 'create responsive layouts, implement animations, design landing pages, build interactive dashboards' to improve specificity.
Expand trigger terms to include common user language like 'website', 'UI', 'HTML/CSS', 'landing page', 'dashboard', 'React component', or 'styled interface'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (frontend interfaces) and some actions (build web components, pages, applications, generates code), but lacks specific concrete actions like 'create responsive layouts, implement animations, style forms' that would make it more comprehensive. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces') and when ('Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications') with an explicit trigger clause. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant terms like 'web components', 'pages', 'applications', and 'frontend', but misses common user variations like 'website', 'UI', 'HTML', 'CSS', 'landing page', 'dashboard', 'React', or file extensions. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The description differentiates itself somewhat with 'high design quality' and 'avoids generic AI aesthetics', but 'frontend interfaces', 'web components', and 'applications' are broad enough to overlap with general coding skills or framework-specific skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
57%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides a solid conceptual framework for creating distinctive frontend designs with clear anti-patterns to avoid and strong aesthetic direction. However, it lacks concrete executable examples (no code snippets showing good vs. bad implementations) and has no validation workflow for ensuring output quality. The motivational tone adds tokens without adding actionable guidance.
Suggestions
Add 1-2 concrete code examples showing a 'generic AI slop' implementation vs. a distinctive implementation to make the guidance actionable and copy-paste ready.
Add a validation/review checklist at the end (e.g., 'Before delivering: verify CSS variables are used, confirm no banned fonts, check animation performance, test responsive behavior').
Remove motivational language like 'Don't hold back, show what can truly be created' and 'Codex is capable of extraordinary creative work'—these waste tokens without adding actionable guidance.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skill contains some unnecessary verbosity and motivational language ('Remember: Codex is capable of extraordinary creative work. Don't hold back...') that doesn't add actionable value. The design thinking section and aesthetics guidelines are reasonably focused but could be tightened—e.g., the long list of aesthetic tones and the repeated emphasis on avoiding 'AI slop' is somewhat redundant. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The skill provides concrete design principles and specific anti-patterns to avoid (named fonts, color schemes), but lacks any executable code examples, templates, or concrete before/after demonstrations. It describes what to do at a conceptual level rather than providing copy-paste ready patterns or starter code snippets. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | There is a loose two-phase workflow (design thinking → implementation) but no explicit validation checkpoints, no feedback loops for reviewing output quality, and no structured checklist for verifying the final result meets the stated aesthetic goals. For a skill that produces production-grade code, a review/validation step would be valuable. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a standalone skill with no bundle files, the content is well-organized into clear sections (Design Thinking, Frontend Aesthetics Guidelines) with appropriate use of bold headers and bullet points. The length is manageable and doesn't need to be split into separate files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- am-will/codex-skills
- Commit
d3983b1
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.