frontend-design
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
Install with Tessl CLI
npx tessl i github:am-will/codex-skills --skill frontend-design67
Does it follow best practices?
If you maintain this skill, you can automatically optimize it using the tessl CLI to improve its score:
npx tessl skill review --optimize ./path/to/skillValidation for skill structure
Discovery
67%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description has a clear structure with explicit 'Use when' guidance, which is a strength. However, it lacks specific concrete actions beyond 'generates code' and misses many natural trigger terms users would employ when requesting frontend work. The distinctiveness relies on qualitative claims ('high design quality', 'polished') rather than concrete differentiators.
Suggestions
Add more specific concrete actions like 'create responsive layouts, implement animations, design forms, build navigation menus' to improve specificity.
Expand trigger terms to include common variations: 'UI', 'website', 'HTML/CSS', 'landing page', 'dashboard', 'React component', '.html files'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (frontend interfaces) and mentions some actions (build web components, pages, applications, generates code), but lacks comprehensive specific actions like 'create responsive layouts, implement animations, style forms'. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both what ('Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces') and when ('Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, or applications') with explicit trigger guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant keywords ('web components', 'pages', 'applications', 'frontend') but misses common variations users would say like 'UI', 'website', 'HTML', 'CSS', 'React', 'landing page', or 'dashboard'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The focus on 'high design quality' and avoiding 'generic AI aesthetics' provides some distinction, but 'web components, pages, or applications' could overlap with general coding skills or other frontend-related skills. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 9 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
50%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This skill provides solid conceptual guidance for creating distinctive frontend interfaces with a clear anti-generic-AI-aesthetic stance. However, it lacks concrete code examples that would make it immediately actionable, and the workflow could benefit from explicit validation steps to ensure output quality. The content is moderately efficient but could be tightened by removing motivational language and adding executable examples.
Suggestions
Add 2-3 concrete code examples showing distinctive implementations (e.g., a typography setup with specific font pairings, a CSS animation pattern, or a color system with CSS variables)
Include a validation checklist or quality criteria to verify the output avoids 'AI slop' aesthetics before delivery
Extract the extensive aesthetic options lists (tone types, background effects) into a separate reference file to keep SKILL.md focused on workflow
Replace motivational statements ('Don't hold back, show what can truly be created') with specific, actionable guidance
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is reasonably efficient but includes some unnecessary elaboration, particularly in the design thinking section and the lengthy lists of aesthetic options. Some phrases like 'Codex is capable of extraordinary creative work' are motivational padding rather than actionable guidance. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides conceptual guidance and principles but lacks concrete, executable code examples. The skill describes what to do (use CSS variables, Motion library, animation-delay) but doesn't show copy-paste ready implementations or specific code patterns. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Has a logical flow (understand context → design thinking → implement) but lacks explicit validation checkpoints. No guidance on how to verify the output meets quality standards or feedback loops for iterating on designs. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Content is reasonably organized with clear sections (Design Thinking, Frontend Aesthetics Guidelines) but is somewhat monolithic. Could benefit from linking to separate files for specific topics like typography resources, color palette examples, or animation patterns. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 8 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.