Build and run Gemini 2.5 Computer Use browser-control agents with Playwright. Use when a user wants to automate web browser tasks via the Gemini Computer Use model, needs an agent loop (screenshot → function_call → action → function_response), or asks to integrate safety confirmation for risky UI actions.
95
93%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly communicates what the skill does (build Gemini 2.5 Computer Use agents with Playwright), when to use it (three explicit trigger scenarios), and uses highly specific terminology that distinguishes it from other automation or AI skills. The description is concise yet comprehensive, with strong trigger terms and a well-structured 'Use when' clause.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Build and run Gemini 2.5 Computer Use browser-control agents with Playwright', describes the agent loop pattern ('screenshot → function_call → action → function_response'), and mentions safety confirmation for risky UI actions. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (build and run Gemini 2.5 Computer Use browser-control agents with Playwright) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause covering three distinct trigger scenarios: automating browser tasks via Gemini, needing an agent loop, or integrating safety confirmation). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural trigger terms users would say: 'Gemini', 'Computer Use', 'browser-control', 'Playwright', 'automate web browser tasks', 'agent loop', 'screenshot', 'safety confirmation', 'risky UI actions'. Good coverage of both high-level and specific terms. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive — the combination of 'Gemini 2.5 Computer Use', 'Playwright', and the specific agent loop pattern creates a very clear niche that is unlikely to conflict with generic browser automation or other AI model skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted skill that is concise, actionable, and well-organized. The quick start section provides copy-paste-ready commands, browser selection is handled efficiently, and references are cleanly separated. The main weakness is the agent loop description lacks explicit error handling or validation checkpoints for when actions fail or produce unexpected results.
Suggestions
Add a brief error recovery note to the core workflow, e.g., what to do if a Playwright action fails or the model returns an unexpected response format, to strengthen the feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every section is lean and purposeful. No unnecessary explanations of what Gemini is, what Playwright does, or how browser automation works. Each token contributes actionable information. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable bash commands for setup and running the agent, specific CLI flags, concrete environment variable names, and a clear example invocation with realistic arguments. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The core agent loop is clearly sequenced with 6 steps including the safety confirmation checkpoint. However, there's no explicit validation/error recovery step — e.g., what to do if the model returns unexpected output, if Playwright fails to execute an action, or how to verify the agent completed its task correctly. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clean overview structure with a Resources section pointing to the script, reference notes, and env template — all one level deep and clearly signaled. Content is appropriately split between the skill overview and referenced files. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
ca2c3b3
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.