Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured, actionable skill with clear workflows and concrete examples. Its main strengths are the executable shell commands, explicit validation steps, and the strict input-confirmation gate before writing. Minor weaknesses include some verbosity in explaining concepts and referencing external files (templates/) that aren't provided in the bundle.
Suggestions
Tighten the 'Non-Negotiable Inputs' section into a compact checklist format rather than a bulleted list with explanatory parentheticals
Either include the referenced templates/ directory in the bundle or remove the reference to avoid dead-end navigation
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Generally efficient but has some redundancy—e.g., restating 'name is the spawn identifier and source of truth' after already establishing it, and the 'Non-Negotiable Inputs' section is somewhat verbose for what could be a simple checklist. The 'Default policy for optional settings' section states things Claude would naturally do if told to keep files minimal. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete shell commands with full flag examples, specific file paths, a ready-to-run JSON invocation example, and explicit validation steps (tomlq). The workflow is copy-paste ready with real commands and realistic parameter values. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly sequenced (collect inputs → resolve path → write file → validate → return example call) with an explicit validation step (step 4: validate TOML parse and required keys) and guardrails for error recovery (check syntax with tomlq, verify scope if unknown agent_type). The execution rule 'do not write until required inputs are explicitly confirmed' acts as a checkpoint. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References external docs and a templates/ directory, but no bundle files are provided to support these references. The content is reasonably structured with clear sections, but some content (like the full role file contract) could potentially be split out. The references to external URLs and templates/ are present but unverifiable without bundle support. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |