Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, actionable orchestration guide with concrete templates, explicit validation feedback loops, and clear sectioning. Its main weakness is an internal inconsistency on the maximum agent count (12 vs 15) across the header, goals, and scheduling sections.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is well-organized and assumes Claude's competence without explaining known concepts, but it carries an internal contradiction (header/goals say 12 vs 15 agents) and the prompt template could be tightened, fitting the level-2 anchor of mostly efficient with some unnecessary/loose material. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It provides a copy-paste task prompt template, exact agent_type, scheduling states, example commands, error-handling rules, and a summary template, matching the level-3 anchor of fully executable, specific guidance. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Six clearly sequenced steps include explicit validation checkpoints (Step 5 validates every completion; Step 6 re-runs tests until green) and error-recovery loops, matching the level-3 anchor of clear sequence with validation feedback. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | With no bundle files present, the single-file skill is organized into clearly labeled sections (Process, Scheduling Policy, Error Handling, templates), meeting the level-3 standard for simple skills needing no external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |