CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

super-swarm-spark

Only to be triggered by explicit super-swarm-spark commands.

Install with Tessl CLI

npx tessl i github:am-will/codex-skills --skill super-swarm-spark
What are skills?

62

Does it follow best practices?

Validation for skill structure

SKILL.md
Review
Evals

Discovery

29%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This description is severely deficient as it provides no information about what the skill actually does. While it has a distinctive trigger term that prevents conflicts, the complete absence of capability information makes it impossible for Claude to understand when this skill would be useful beyond recognizing the exact command phrase.

Suggestions

Add concrete actions describing what this skill does (e.g., 'Orchestrates distributed task processing across multiple agents' or whatever the actual capability is)

Expand the 'Use when...' clause to include natural language variations users might say when they need this functionality, not just the exact command

Describe the purpose and outcomes of using this skill so Claude can intelligently select it even when users don't use the exact trigger phrase

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description contains no concrete actions whatsoever. It only states when to trigger but provides zero information about what the skill actually does.

1 / 3

Completeness

The description completely fails to answer 'what does this do' - it only addresses 'when' (explicit commands) without any explanation of capabilities or purpose.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Contains one specific trigger term 'super-swarm-spark' which is distinctive, but it's technical jargon rather than natural language users would say, and there are no variations or related terms.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The unique trigger term 'super-swarm-spark' is highly distinctive and unlikely to conflict with other skills due to its specificity as an explicit command.

3 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Implementation

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-structured orchestration skill with strong actionability and clear workflow sequencing including validation checkpoints. The main weaknesses are moderate verbosity with repeated information and a monolithic structure that could benefit from splitting templates into separate files. The skill effectively communicates the rolling pool concept and provides concrete implementation guidance.

Suggestions

Remove redundant mentions of the 12-agent limit (appears in title, Step 4, and Scheduling Policy section)

Consider extracting the Task Prompt Template and Execution Summary Template into separate referenced files to improve progressive disclosure

Consolidate the scheduling policy information into Step 4 rather than having a separate section that repeats the same constraints

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is reasonably efficient but contains some redundancy (e.g., repeating the 12-agent limit multiple times, verbose template sections). The scheduling policy section restates information already covered in Step 4.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, executable guidance with specific templates, exact parameters (agent_type: sparky), clear step-by-step processes, and example usage commands. The task prompt template is copy-paste ready.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear 6-step sequence with explicit validation at Step 5, integration pass at Step 6, and feedback loops (retry/escalate on failure, re-run tests until green). States are explicitly defined (pending, running, completed, failed).

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Content is well-structured with clear sections, but everything is in a single monolithic file. The lengthy task prompt template and execution summary template could be split into separate reference files for cleaner navigation.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation11 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.