docs-writer
Documentation workflow that converts requirements into structured AsciiDoc sections, runs Vale for style compliance, and produces merge-ready content. Use when creating or updating AsciiDoc documentation from Jira tickets, GitHub issues, or feature descriptions.
90
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
Pending
No eval scenarios have been run
Advisory
Suggest reviewing before use
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is an excellent skill description that clearly articulates specific capabilities, includes a well-formed 'Use when' clause with concrete trigger scenarios, and occupies a distinct niche. It uses proper third-person voice, avoids vague language, and provides enough detail for Claude to confidently select this skill when appropriate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: converts requirements into structured AsciiDoc sections, runs Vale for style compliance, and produces merge-ready content. These are clear, actionable capabilities. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (converts requirements into AsciiDoc, runs Vale, produces merge-ready content) and 'when' (explicit 'Use when' clause specifying creating/updating AsciiDoc from Jira tickets, GitHub issues, or feature descriptions). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes strong natural keywords users would say: 'AsciiDoc', 'documentation', 'Vale', 'Jira tickets', 'GitHub issues', 'feature descriptions', 'merge-ready'. These cover multiple natural entry points for this workflow. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Highly distinctive with a clear niche: the combination of AsciiDoc format, Vale linting, and requirement-to-documentation conversion from specific sources (Jira, GitHub issues) makes this unlikely to conflict with other skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-structured workflow orchestrator skill with strong actionability and clear phase sequencing including validation feedback loops. Its main weakness is moderate redundancy between sections (phases listed multiple times, overlapping examples) and the inability to verify referenced bundle files. The concrete commands and explicit exit criteria make it highly usable despite the slight verbosity.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'Phases' and 'Phase Transitions' sections into a single section to eliminate redundancy — the phase list with exit criteria and transition rules can coexist in one table or list.
Consider removing the 'Example Session' block since the individual phase examples (/gather, /validate) already demonstrate the workflow more concretely.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is mostly efficient but has some redundancy — the phase list appears in both the 'Phases' section and 'Phase Transitions' section with overlapping information. The 'Example Session' and 'Example: Running /gather' sections also partially duplicate each other. However, it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable commands (mkdir, vale, gh issue view, gh pr diff), specific file paths, and clear artifact naming conventions. The /gather and /validate examples are fully actionable with copy-paste ready commands and explicit steps. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The multi-step workflow is clearly sequenced with explicit phase transitions, exit criteria, and validation feedback loops (validate → fix → re-validate). The /validate example includes a clear retry loop, and the phase transitions section explicitly states when to stop for user approval and when to loop back on failure. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | References to `skills/controller.md`, `skills/{name}.md`, and `guidelines.md` are present but no bundle files were provided to verify they exist. The SKILL.md itself contains a reasonable amount of inline content but the 'Phases' and 'Phase Transitions' sections could potentially be consolidated or deferred to the controller. References are one-level deep and clearly signaled, which is good. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
- Repository
- amir-yogev-gh/ai-workflows
- Commit
ab0156d
- Reviewed
Table of Contents
Is this your skill?
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.