Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured orchestrator body: extremely lean, clearly sequenced dispatch logic with an explicit error-handling checkpoint, and appropriate one-level-deep delegation to command and controller files. The gaps keeping it from top scores are an unhandled dispatch case (no command, no Jira key, no phase requested) and the fact that all execution substance — including the referenced files themselves — lives outside the body and cannot be verified in this bundle.
Suggestions
Define the fallback dispatch case: when the user invokes no command, provides no Jira issue, and names no phase, state the default behavior (e.g., ask the user which phase to start, or begin with /ingest) instead of leaving it undefined.
Briefly enumerate the available phases/commands in the body (they currently appear only in the frontmatter description) so the orchestrator's scope is visible without opening skills/controller.md, and confirm `commands/{command}.md`, `skills/controller.md`, and `guidelines.md` actually ship in the bundle.
Add one concrete dispatch example — e.g., a sample Jira issue key format or a short "user says X → run phase Y" mapping — so the Quick Start guidance is copy-paste ready rather than fully delegated.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~25-line body is lean dispatcher prose with zero concept explanations and no padding — every line is instruction ("read `commands/{command}.md` and follow it", "read `skills/controller.md` to load the workflow controller"), and the error-handling paragraph adds only actionable content. It matches the 5 anchor: assumes Claude's competence and every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is concrete for a dispatcher — exact file paths, named commands (`/draft`, `/clarify`, `/ingest`), specific failure examples ("Jira MCP errors, network failures, invalid issue keys") and a defined error protocol. It falls short of the 5 anchor (fully executable, covers the common cases) because one dispatch case is undefined — a user who invokes no command, provides no Jira key, and names no phase — and all actual execution detail is delegated to controller.md rather than given even in outline. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The entry sequence is clear (command → commands/{command}.md; otherwise → controller.md with a Jira-key/no-key branch) and there is an explicit failure checkpoint with a feedback loop ("stop and report the error... Do not advance... Offer to retry... or escalate"). It sits at the 4 anchor rather than 5 because the sequence delegates phase ordering entirely to an external file and leaves the no-input case undefined, so the checkpoints are present but the full flow is not self-contained. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a genuine overview that pushes all detail one level deep through clearly signaled references (`commands/{command}.md`, `skills/controller.md`, `guidelines.md`), matching the good-structure pattern. It does not reach 5 because the referenced files are not present in the bundle to verify (no commands/, skills/, or guidelines.md exist here) and the available commands are not enumerated in the body — they are only discoverable from the frontmatter description, a minor organization gap. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |