Content
71%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is an admirably lean router with an explicit failure policy and clear dispatch logic, but it delegates all substance to skills/*.md and guidelines.md files that are missing from the bundle, leaving the instructions unactionable as shipped. The existing scripts/ files are also never referenced, so bundle navigation is broken despite the good structural design.
Suggestions
Ship the referenced `skills/{phase}.md` files and `guidelines.md` in the bundle (or inline their key routing details into SKILL.md) so every dispatch instruction resolves to a real file.
Reference the existing `scripts/` files (e.g., `scripts/scan.py`, `scripts/render_report.py`) from SKILL.md or the phase files so the bundle's implementation is discoverable.
State per-phase success criteria (e.g., what a completed scan looks like before advancing to analyze) to make the stop-on-failure checkpoint concrete rather than generic.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~25-line body is pure routing logic, a failure policy ("If a step fails or produces unexpected output, stop and report the error to the user"), and one pointer to guidelines — zero padding and no explanations of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place; matches anchor 5. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The routing guidance itself is concrete ("read `skills/run.md` and follow it", "start with `skills/start.md` to validate access and create the workspace") and covers every invocation pattern, but every referenced target (`skills/*.md`, `guidelines.md`) is absent from the actual bundle, so the instructions cannot be executed as shipped. Matches anchor 3 (concrete but incomplete, missing key resources) rather than 4, where guidance would be executable with only minor gaps. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear numbered decision sequence covers command invocations, project-key-without-command, and no-input cases, with an explicit stop-on-failure checkpoint ("Do not advance to the next phase. Offer to retry the failed step or escalate") — satisfying the batch-operation validation requirement. Not 5: per-phase ordering and success criteria are delegated to sub-files rather than stated; not 3: a validation checkpoint and error-recovery options are explicitly present. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The reference design is good — one level deep, clearly signaled ("see `guidelines.md`", `skills/{phase}.md`) — but scored against the actual bundle: none of the referenced files exist, and the present `scripts/` files (e.g., `scripts/scan.py`, `scripts/render_report.py`) are never referenced from the body. Navigation as shipped is broken, dropping it below anchor 4's 'minor organization gaps' to 3. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |