Conciseness

Roughly 35 lean lines where every instruction is actionable; it explains nothing Claude already knows, and the one explanatory parenthetical ('Plain `gh issue view <n>` may fail on Projects-classic GraphQL — prefer the `--json` form') is non-obvious, earned knowledge — matching the 'every token earns its place' anchor.

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready commands (`gh issue view <n> --json title,body,state,labels,comments,author,createdAt` and the full `git checkout <base> && git pull --ff-only && git checkout -b <type>/<n>-<short-slug> <base>` sequence) plus a concrete branch-name example (fix/2348-dts-in-source); the implement phase's absence of code is inherent to the task and its guidance remains concrete.

Workflow Clarity

Four clearly sequenced phases (understand → branch → implement → hand off) with explicit validation checkpoints: confirm the approach before behavior-changing edits, stop and surface on `--ff-only` failure, run tests/typecheck with honest reporting when dependencies are absent, and explicit regression reasoning. Matches the anchor-5 sequence-with-validation pattern; no destructive/batch cap applies.

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with no external reference material needed, so a single well-organized file with numbered sections is the correct structure per the rubric's simple-skill note; cross-mentions (open-pr, verify, code-review) are skill invocations that clarify ownership, not buried file references.

Specificity

Lists four concrete actions covering the full flow — 'fetch and understand the issue, create a feature branch off `beta`, implement and verify the fix, then hand off to the open-pr skill' — with specifics beyond the anchor-4 example (named base branch, named handoff skill), matching the comprehensive anchor 5.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both 'what' (all four end-to-end phases) and 'when' with a concrete 'Use when the user says...' clause listing exact trigger phrases — a direct match for the anchor-5 example, clearly above anchor 4 whose 'when' is less specific.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural quoted trigger phrases users would say ('fix issue <n>', 'work on issue <n>', 'take an issue from investigation through to a PR') with good keyword coverage, but misses common variations such as 'resolve/close/address issue' or issue-URL phrasing, so it falls short of the synonym-saturated anchor 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (GitHub issue resolution workflow) with distinct command-shaped triggers; the explicit 'hand off to the open-pr skill' clause delineates the boundary with the most closely related skill, minimizing conflict risk.