Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a deliberately stripped deprecation pointer — concise and well-structured, but it offers no substantive guidance on Angular DI itself, only migration commands. Actionability and workflow clarity are limited to the redirect, not the skill's stated purpose.
Suggestions
If the skill must remain installed, restore a minimal inline pointer to the specific official sub-skill covering DI (e.g. a direct deep link) so users land on the right replacement rather than a repo root.
Add a one-line note on what to verify after running 'npx skills remove analogjs/angular-skills' (e.g. confirm the skill no longer appears in the registry) to give the destructive step a validation checkpoint.
Consider whether the deprecation rationale ('removed rather than left to go stale') can be trimmed; the core redirect commands carry the message on their own.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean deprecation notice with no padding or over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line serves the redirect intent. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Two concrete executable commands are present ('npx skills add https://github.com/angular/skills', 'npx skills remove analogjs/angular-skills'), but all actionable guidance for the skill's actual subject (Angular DI) has been intentionally removed, leaving key details missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The redirect action is unambiguous (install official skills, remove these), but there is no real task workflow for the skill's domain and no validation around the mildly destructive remove step. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no need for external bundle references; the single blockquote deprecation notice is well-organized and the outbound link is appropriately signaled. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |