Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is highly actionable with a clear, validated multi-stage workflow, but loses points on conciseness (repetition) and progressive disclosure (broken references and inlined detail that belongs in the reference files).
Suggestions
Fix or remove the missing references: create references/data-analysis.md, scripts/music_generator.py, and scripts/audio_quality_checker.py, or remove their links from the body.
Deduplicate the quality-check instructions (merge '质量检测工具使用' and '质量检测流程' into one section) to reduce token overhead.
Move the full 11-agent responsibility breakdown into references/agent-prompts.md and keep only a concise role/trigger summary inline, so the SKILL.md body stays an overview.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Largely efficient and free of basic-concept padding, but ~500 lines with notable repetition (quality-check usage appears in both '质量检测工具使用' and '质量检测流程', and JSON configs are repeated), so it could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready bash and python commands with real paths, arguments, and full JSON config examples covering the common cases (image/audio/subtitle generation, video compositing, quality checks). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear 5-stage sequence with explicit trigger nodes, per-agent '下一级触发' handoffs, and explicit validation/feedback loops ('前置质检拦截', '不合格驳回', detect anomaly -> regenerate -> recheck), so the batch/destructive cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Has a clear '资源索引' and inline '参考:' links to one-level-deep references, but three referenced paths do not exist in the bundle (references/data-analysis.md, scripts/music_generator.py, scripts/audio_quality_checker.py) and substantial 11-agent detail is inlined rather than delegated. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |