Content
50%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is actionable with concrete commands and a clear publish sequence, but it is verbose with a workflow repeated three times, lacks validation checkpoints for an outward-facing operation, and inlines detail that belongs in reference files alongside a broken external link. It would benefit materially from de-duplication and a verification step.
Suggestions
De-duplicate the publish workflow: keep a single canonical sequence and have the Scripts and Example sections reference it instead of re-listing all 9 steps, removing emoji-heavy redundant prose to improve conciseness.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the publish workflow (e.g. confirm the draft was saved and verify converted rich-text formatting before handing back to the user), since publishing is outward-facing.
Move the smart title/cover-generation prompt templates and the parse_markdown.py JSON schema into reference files under references/, document the unused scripts (debug_editor.py, debug_page.py, site_config.py), and fix or remove the broken ../skill-development-guide/technical-lessons.md link.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Noticeably verbose: the publish workflow is repeated across the Scripts, Workflow (简化版), and Example sections, and emoji-laden Chinese prose re-explains script behavior, adding padded sections that could be tightened. This fits the level-2 anchor better than 3 because of the multiple redundant walkthroughs. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides mostly executable, copy-paste-ready commands (e.g. `python publish_article.py --file article.md --headless`, `python copy_to_clipboard.py image /path/to/image.jpg [--quality 80]`) and a documented JSON output schema, with only the minor gap that cover-image upload "目前需要在浏览器中手动操作". Fits the level-4 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The 9-step 一键发布 sequence is clearly listed, but there are no validation checkpoints (e.g. verify draft saved, verify formatting) for an outward-facing publishing operation. Per the rubric's feedback-loop cap, a destructive/outward-facing skill without validation cannot exceed 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Scripts are referenced one level deep and signaled, but the smart-enhancement prompts and JSON format details are inlined in SKILL.md rather than split into reference files, three scripts (debug_editor.py, debug_page.py, site_config.py) are undocumented, and the external link ../skill-development-guide/technical-lessons.md does not resolve to a real file. This fits the level-3 anchor's "could be better organized" profile. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 12 / 20 Passed |