Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, actionable overview that correctly delegates detailed templates to one-level-deep reference files. Its weak spots are redundancy between the generation and optimization flows and the lack of explicit validation gates in the workflows.
Suggestions
Consolidate shared guidance (标题, 正文, 标签 techniques) so the 笔记优化 flow references the generation flow instead of restating it, and trim the 使用示例 section to only illustrate what the steps do not already cover.
Add an explicit verification checkpoint at the end of each flow (e.g., '对照质量标准检查标题/正文/标签，不达标则返回修改') to turn the scattered checks into a clear validate-then-proceed gate.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly domain-specific actionable guidance without explaining known concepts, but the 笔记优化 flow largely mirrors the 笔记生成 flow and the 使用示例 section restates the steps, adding redundancy that could be tightened. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance for an instruction-only skill: explicit 正文结构 sub-sections, a 文生图 formula (主体+描述+场景+风格+细节+构图) with specific word banks, and a ready-made example title; the actual templates live in referenced files, leaving minor gaps in the body itself. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Three clearly numbered multi-step flows are present, but validation checkpoints are implicit and scattered (a soft '优化笔记质量' check step, a separate 质量标准 section, 注意事项) rather than framed as explicit validate-then-proceed gates. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a concise overview with a dedicated 资源索引 that signals each one-level-deep reference (note_templates.md, tag_library.md, image_prompt_guide.md, makeup_trends.md) along with its purpose; all referenced files exist in ./references/ and navigation is easy. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |