CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

xiaohongshu-makeup

小红书美妆内容创作技能,支持笔记生成、笔记优化、文生图描述创作;适用于美妆护肤产品的内容创作、测评和营销推广

60

Quality

70%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/xiaohongshu-makeup/xiaohongshu-makeup/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-organized, actionable instruction skill with clear workflows and strong progressive disclosure via real one-level-deep reference files. The main gaps are mild redundancy in the examples section and the absence of explicit validation/feedback checkpoints in the workflows.

Suggestions

Tighten the 使用示例 section so it illustrates outputs rather than re-listing the 操作步骤 steps already covered above.

Add an explicit validation/check step to each workflow (e.g. a 笔记自检 checklist mapping to 质量标准) so each flow ends with verify-then-fix guidance.

De-duplicate the reference links between the inline citations and the 资源索引 section, or keep references only in the index to reduce repetition.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient and does not explain concepts Claude already knows, but the 使用示例 section restates workflow steps already covered in 操作步骤 and the inline references overlap with the 资源索引 section, so it could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

As an instruction-only skill it provides concrete, specific guidance — a prompt formula (主体+描述+场景+风格+细节+构图), term libraries (光泽皮肤、清透底妆), sample titles ("✨挖到宝了!...") and tags (#护肤推荐 #美白 #烟酰胺) — which is copy-ready and actionable.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The three workflows are clearly numbered and sequenced with a built-in 质量标准 checklist, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or fix→retry feedback loops within the workflows, so they stop short of the anchor for 3.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

SKILL.md acts as an overview with well-signaled, one-level-deep references to four real bundle files (note_templates.md, tag_library.md, image_prompt_guide.md, makeup_trends.md), surfaced both inline and in a labeled 资源索引 with per-file purposes.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

67%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific and clearly niched to Xiaohongshu makeup/skincare content, with three named capabilities. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause, which leaves the "when to use" guidance implicit and caps completeness and trigger-term quality.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause naming natural user triggers, e.g. 'Use when the user asks to write, optimize, or generate images for a 小红书 (Xiaohongshu) beauty/skincare note.'

Surface common user phrasings such as '写小红书笔记', '优化笔记', '生成配图提示词' so trigger terms match what users actually say.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description enumerates multiple concrete actions — "笔记生成"、"笔记优化"、"文生图描述创作" — matching the anchor for listing several specific capabilities rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

It states what the skill does, but lacks an explicit "Use when..." trigger clause; per the guidelines a missing explicit trigger clause caps completeness at 2, and the "适用于..." only implies when to use it.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It contains relevant domain keywords (小红书、笔记、美妆、文生图), but trigger guidance is framed as an applicability statement ("适用于...") rather than natural user utterances, so common trigger phrasings are only partially covered.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is sharply defined — 小红书美妆护肤 content creation — with domain-specific triggers, making it unlikely to fire for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
anbeime/skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.