CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

xiaohongshu-makeup

自媒体创作者与电商运营在推广美妆护肤产品时,当需要创作或优化小红书笔记、生成AI配图提示词时,使用此技能可一键生成高转化爆款笔记、吸睛标题与精准标签,自动产出专业文生图提示词,轻松打造小红书爆款内容。

64

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/xiaohongshu-makeup/xiaohongshu-makeup/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, actionable instruction skill: three clearly sequenced workflows, concrete Xiaohongshu-specific guidance, and a clean reference bundle (4 real files, one level deep, each with a stated purpose). The main cost is redundancy — example sections that restate the workflows instead of demonstrating output, overlapping notes/quality sections, and inline word lists that duplicate the reference guides.

Suggestions

Rewrite the 使用示例 section as genuine worked examples — one complete generated note (title + full body + final tag set) rather than restating the workflow steps, which would simultaneously cut redundancy and lift actionability.

Merge the overlapping 注意事项 and 质量标准 sections into a single checklist, and fold the inline 皮肤/妆容/光线/构图 word lists into image_prompt_guide.md, keeping SKILL.md as a pointer plus only the construction formula.

Turn the quality-check step into an explicit validation gate: after generating a note, verify it against the 质量标准 checklist and regenerate/revise the failing parts before delivering.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient bullet-style instruction with genuine domain knowledge (Xiaohongshu slang like '绝绝子/家人们', template taxonomies, the prompt formula 主体+描述+场景+风格+细节+构图), but it carries padded, redundant sections: the 使用示例 (usage examples) section (~30 lines) largely restates the three workflows instead of showing new concrete output, and 注意事项 overlaps heavily with 质量标准. This fits anchor 3 (mostly efficient but could be tightened) rather than 2, since no space is spent explaining concepts Claude already knows.

3 / 5

Actionability

Guidance is concrete and executable for an instruction-only skill: a specific product-info intake checklist, 8 named template types linked to note_templates.md, an explicit 10-15 tag count, a six-part prompt construction formula, and a sample title ('✨挖到宝了!…') with sample tags. Minor gap: no fully worked example note showing the end-to-end output, keeping it below anchor 5.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Three clearly sequenced numbered workflows (note generation, note optimization, image-prompt creation) each with ordered sub-steps, plus an explicit quality-check step ('检查是否符合小红书风格…') and a 质量标准 checklist serving as validation. It falls short of anchor 5 because checkpoints are described as things to check rather than explicit gate conditions with error-recovery loops (e.g. what to do when a generated note fails the checklist). No destructive/batch operations, so no cap applies.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

The body is an overview with four real, verified one-level-deep reference files (note_templates.md, tag_library.md, makeup_trends.md, image_prompt_guide.md), all linked inline and again in a 资源索引 section that states each file's purpose — good navigation with no nested references. It misses anchor 5 because some detail that belongs in the reference guides is duplicated inline (the 皮肤/妆容/光线/构图 word lists repeat image_prompt_guide.md content, and the 标题优化 bullets repeat note_templates.md content).

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-targeted description with an explicit 'use when' trigger clause, concrete capability list, and a clearly distinct niche. Its main weakness is marketing-style padding — buzzwords and over-claims like 'one-click generate' and 'guaranteed high-conversion viral' — that inflate the text without adding capability information, plus a few missing platform-native trigger synonyms.

Suggestions

Remove over-claiming buzzwords ('一键生成' one-click, '高转化爆款' high-conversion viral, '轻松打造' effortlessly build) and state the concrete deliverables plainly: generates Xiaohongshu notes with titles and tags, plus text-to-image prompts, from product info.

Add common user phrasings as trigger terms, e.g. '种草文案' (seeding copy), '小红书文案', '笔记排版', so the skill triggers on the vocabulary users actually type.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description lists several concrete actions ("创作或优化小红书笔记" create/optimize notes, "吸睛标题与精准标签" titles and tags, "自动产出专业文生图提示词" text-to-image prompts), but they are wrapped in marketing fluff and over-claims — "一键生成" (one-click generation), "高转化爆款" (guaranteed high-conversion viral), "轻松打造" — which the guidelines explicitly penalize. It sits below anchor 4 because the buzzwords dilute what the skill concretely does, but well above anchor 2 because the domain and multiple real actions are named.

3 / 5

Completeness

Both what and when are explicitly answered with concrete trigger phrases: what — "一键生成高转化爆款笔记、吸睛标题与精准标签,自动产出专业文生图提示词"; when — "当需要创作或优化小红书笔记、生成AI配图提示词时,使用此技能". This matches the anchor-5 example structure (capabilities sentence + explicit 'Use when' clause).

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Natural phrases a user would actually say are present: "创作或优化小红书笔记", "生成AI配图提示词", "推广美妆护肤产品". Common Xiaohongshu-native variations like "种草" (seeding/recommendation posts) and "文案" (copywriting) are missing, so it does not reach anchor 5's comprehensive synonym coverage.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is tightly scoped to Xiaohongshu beauty/skincare content creation ("小红书" platform, "美妆护肤产品", "自媒体创作者与电商运营"), with triggers (笔记创作/优化, 配图提示词) that no general-purpose skill would claim. Minimal conflict risk with other skills.

5 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
anbeime/skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.