CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

comments

Review open NPRM comment periods, log decisions, track deadlines. Use when an NPRM has a comment window open and you need to surface deadlines, decide whether to file, or record a filing / not-filing / waived decision (--decide CMT-ID).

74

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured instruction skill with concrete commands, paths, templates, and an explicit safety gate for the consequential filing action. Its only weakness is verbosity in the gate section, where an inline brief template and lawyer-referral list could be tightened or moved to a reference.

Suggestions

Tighten the consequential-action gate: trim the jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction lawyer-referral sentence to a single pointer, or move the full brief template into a referenced reference file and keep only the gate prompt inline.

Consider moving the 'Consequential-action gate' brief template (regulator/docket, what it says, open questions, what could go wrong, what to ask) into the gap-surfacer reference so the SKILL.md gate stays a short checkpoint.

The decision-logging block would be marginally more actionable if it showed the exact tracker.yaml field update (e.g., status → 'filing') alongside the command, rather than only prose.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The core sections (table template, command, notifications) are lean, but the consequential-action gate carries a long inline brief template plus a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction lawyer-referral paragraph that could be trimmed or deferred; not a 3 because some of this verbosity could be tightened, not a 2-below because it avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides executable command syntax ('/regulatory-legal:comments --decide CMT-ID'), concrete config file paths to load, an exact tracker-view table template, and specific reminder timings (14 days, 3 days) — copy-paste-ready guidance.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The decision flow is sequenced (load context → surface open periods → remind → decide) with an explicit consequential-action gate as a validation checkpoint ('Do not log a filing decision... without an explicit yes'), satisfying the explicit-checkpoint anchor.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized into discrete sections with one-level-deep deferral — substantive semantics are signaled to live in the sibling 'gap-surfacer reference skill' to 'load before doing substantive work', with no nested references and no monolithic wall.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, third-person description that states concrete capabilities and gives an explicit 'Use when' trigger with natural domain terms. It clearly separates this skill's niche from adjacent regulatory skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'Review open NPRM comment periods, log decisions, track deadlines' plus 'surface deadlines, decide whether to file, or record a filing / not-filing / waived decision' — matching the multiple-specific-actions anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what ('Review open NPRM comment periods, log decisions, track deadlines') and when via an explicit 'Use when an NPRM has a comment window open...' clause, matching the what-and-when anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Covers natural terms the target legal user would say — 'NPRM', 'comment period', 'comment window', 'deadlines', 'decide whether to file', 'filing / not-filing / waived' — with good variation rather than single jargon.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Occupies a clear niche (NPRM comment-period tracking) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; not above 3 because the scale caps there.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
anthropics/claude-for-legal
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.