Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A thorough, highly actionable screening workflow with clear sequencing and gating, weakened mainly by redundancy in its disclaimers and a monolithic structure with no progressive disclosure. Fixing the repetition and splitting reference material into bundled files would lift the two lowest dimensions.
Suggestions
Consolidate the 'first-pass screen, not a patentability opinion' / 'never say patentable' disclaimer into a single authoritative statement instead of repeating it across the intro, dedicated section, and guardrails.
De-duplicate the practice-profile loading instructions (currently in both the 'Instructions' step 1 and the 'Load the practice profile first' section).
Move the detailed per-screen red/green flag rubrics and the memo template into reference files under references/ (e.g., SCREENS.md, MEMO-TEMPLATE.md) and link to them from SKILL.md to improve progressive disclosure.
Resolve the 'five screens' vs six-screen inconsistency in the Workflow Step 2 heading.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient domain-specific screening guidance, but padded by repetition — the 'first-pass screen, not a patentability opinion' / 'never say patentable' disclaimer recurs 3–4 times and the practice-profile-loading instructions appear twice — so it fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than fully lean. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Highly actionable for an instruction-only skill: a concrete seven-question intake batch, six screens each with red/green flags and worked examples, a copy-paste memo template, and a five-branch decision tree — matching 'specific examples; copy-paste ready'. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequence (intake → six screens → assemble memo → verdict) with explicit checkpoints (placeholder gate, wait-for-full-disclosure, practice-profile routing, time-sensitive flagging); a minor 'five screens' vs six inconsistency exists but does not break the gated workflow. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clear headers, but the ~470-line body is a single monolith with no external reference files and no bundle files present; content that could be split (detailed screen rubrics, memo template) is inline, fitting 'content that should be separate is inline'. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |