CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

matter-close

Close a matter — capture outcome, final exposure, and lessons, then archive it out of the active portfolio without deleting the record. Use when the user wants to close a matter, says "[matter] is done", or needs to record a settlement, dismissal, judgment, withdrawal, or consolidation outcome.

74

Quality

92%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A strong, actionable instruction skill with explicit gates and validation for a consequential legal operation. The only weakness is conciseness: the terse top-of-file summary largely restates the detailed sections, adding redundant tokens.

Suggestions

Collapse the opening six-line numbered summary into a one-line pointer to the detailed sections below (or drop it) — its content is fully covered in '## The close' and '## Writing', so the duplication costs tokens without adding guidance.

If the summary is retained as a TL;DR, mark it explicitly as such and ensure the detailed sections hold the only normative field/path templates so there is a single source of truth.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean and assumes legal competence (no explanations of what matters or settlements are), but the opening six-line numbered summary duplicates the expanded sections below (resolution types, exposure, lessons, history append, _log.yaml update all appear twice), so not every token earns its place — a score-2 "mostly efficient but could be tightened" rather than score-3 lean.

2 / 3

Actionability

Fully concrete and copy-paste ready: exact YAML field structure (status/closed/outcome/final_cost/last_updated), a complete history.md markdown template, exact file paths, and a resolution-type enum — no pseudocode or missing key details, matching the score-3 anchor.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Clear sequence with explicit checkpoints for a consequential operation: a conflicts gate (refuse if the slug is absent from _log.yaml), a non-lawyer role gate requiring an explicit yes before writing, and a Confirm step showing the user the close entry and yaml changes before writing — meeting the score-3 anchor for explicit validation and feedback loops.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

Single well-organized file with clear sections (Purpose, Load context, Input, The close, Writing, Confirm, What this skill does not do), one one-level signaled pointer (CLAUDE.md "Who's using this"), and no nested references or misplaced inline content; nothing demands splitting.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is exemplary: third-person voice, concrete actions, an explicit "Use when" trigger with natural phrasings, and a distinct niche unlikely to conflict. No specificity voice penalty applies.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names multiple concrete actions — "capture outcome, final exposure, and lessons", "archive it out of the active portfolio without deleting the record" — matching the score-3 anchor for specific concrete actions rather than the score-2 domain-plus-some-actions level.

3 / 3

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (capture/archive) and when via a concrete "Use when…" clause with triggers, so it is not capped at 2 by a missing explicit-when clause.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Surfaces natural user phrasings ("close a matter", "[matter] is done") plus outcome keywords (settlement, dismissal, judgment, withdrawal, consolidation), giving broad coverage of terms a legal user would actually say rather than the score-2 partial set.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clearly distinct legal niche with highly specific outcome triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, well above the score-2 "somewhat specific but could overlap" level.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
anthropics/claude-for-legal
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.