Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a tight, fully-actionable workflow with strong validation gates and feedback loops, organized into clearly labeled sections. It is self-contained and appropriately scoped for a single-purpose legal-matter update skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes Claude's competence — it never explains what a matter, history file, or yaml log is — and each section earns its tokens with specific guidance rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete file paths, exact log field lists, ready-to-deliver prompt text, and a copy-paste markdown template for the history entry make the guidance fully executable rather than descriptive. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence (load context → conflicts gate → input → update → write → confirm) carries multiple explicit validation checkpoints (unbypassable conflicts gate, settlement-acceptance gate, explicit materiality prompt, show-diff-before-write confirm). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, so the self-contained body is judged on its own organization; sections are well-labeled and navigable, which the rubric permits to score 3 for a focused single-purpose skill without external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |