Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a well-sequenced, validation-rich workflow appropriate to fabrication-risk legal leads. Its one weakness is conciseness: rationale prose and repeated "leads not authorities" framing could be trimmed without losing clarity.
Suggestions
Cut the inferable rationale paragraphs (e.g., 'Legal research is essential to clinical education... Students spend hours finding the starting point...' and 'This is a pedagogical safeguard, not just an ethical one') since Claude already understands why research roadmaps matter.
Consolidate the repeated 'leads not authorities' framing — it currently appears in the header, Purpose, Step 3's 'No silent supplement', the output banner, 'What this skill does NOT do', and the closing cite-verification block; stating it once prominently and referencing it would reduce tokens.
Consider moving the large inline output-template block into a referenced file if the skill grows, though it is acceptable inline at its current size.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient but carries rationale/purpose prose Claude can infer ("Legal research is essential to clinical education... Students spend hours...", "This is a pedagogical safeguard, not just an ethical one") and repeats the "leads not authorities" framing across the header, Purpose, Step 3, the output banner, and the closing cite-verification block; tightening these would earn score 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives fully concrete, copy-ready guidance — real Westlaw/CourtListener query syntax ("warranty of habitability" /s heat! & [State]), bracketed blockquote templates, an exact thin-result messaging script with four numbered options, and a source-attribution tag taxonomy — matching the fully-executable anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 0–4 are clearly sequenced with explicit validation checkpoints — VERIFY flags, UNCERTAIN blocks, the "No silent supplement" stopping rule, and the citator verification step — plus a feedback loop for the fabrication-risk core of the task, satisfying the clear-sequence-with-validation anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | It is a self-contained, single-purpose skill with no bundle files and no nested references; sections are cleanly organized with headers and there is no monolithic wall or 2+-level nesting, so per the simple-skills note it earns score 3 for well-organized content. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |