Conciseness

Much of the detail is genuinely specialized legal content Claude should not assume, but the body carries clear redundancy: the three-mode summary is repeated (top instructions and the Purpose section) and the jurisdiction note appears both as Instruction step 5 and again as the "Jurisdiction assumption" section. It is not score 3 because of this duplicated material, and not score 1 because the bulk is substantive rather than explaining concepts Claude already knows.

Actionability

Exact §512(c)(3) and §512(g)(3) element lists, verbatim statement language, concrete output paths, the copyright.gov DMCA directory URL, and a full triage-memo template give copy-paste-ready executable guidance. It is not score 2 because the instructions are complete and specific rather than pseudocode or abstract.

Workflow Clarity

Each mode has numbered Steps with explicit validation checkpoints (fair-use gate, loud gate) and feedback loops ("debatable"/"likely" fair use stops the draft and routes to attorney review; "Do not write the final output without explicit engagement"). It is not score 2 because checkpoints and error-recovery loops are explicit for these consequential sworn-statement operations.

Progressive Disclosure

The skill is a single ~448-line file with no references/scripts/assets bundle, and content that could be split (triage memo template, loud-gate ASCII blocks) is inline. It is not score 3 because the under-50-lines simple-skill exemption does not apply and no one-level-deep reference files exist, and not score 1 because the body is well-sectioned rather than a disorganized wall of text.

Specificity

"Draft a DMCA takedown notice, triage one you received, or draft a §512(g) counter-notice" lists multiple specific concrete actions (draft, triage, draft counter-notice), matching the score-3 anchor. It is not score 2 because the actions are concrete and enumerated rather than partial.

Completeness

It explicitly states what the skill does (draft / triage / counter) and includes an explicit "Use when..." clause covering all three triggers, answering both what and when. It is not score 2 because the when is explicit rather than merely implied.

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms like "DMCA takedown notice", "counter-notice", and "triage" are present, but the "Use when" clause is dominated by statutory jargon (§512(c)(3), §512(g)(3), perjury gates, consent-to-federal-jurisdiction) that a lay user would not naturally say. It is not score 3 because common natural variations are buried under technical citations, and not score 1 because several relevant everyday keywords do appear.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The DMCA takedown / counter-notice / triage niche has distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills. It is not score 2 because the scope is sharply bounded to a specific statutory regime rather than overlapping with general legal or document skills.