Conciseness

The body is dense instruction with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows, but the consent rules are stated multiple times ("A default never counts as a yes", "still stop at every consent question", and the repeated consent language in the closing paragraph) and could be trimmed — efficient with minor repetition, matching 4 rather than the every-token-earns-its-place anchor at 5.

Actionability

The guidance is copy-paste ready for an instruction-only skill: exact question texts with defaults (questions 1-6), literal tool calls (Glob on "CLAUDE.md" and ".claude/settings.json", the repo-scout command list, AskUserQuestion options), and a concrete fill-in FAQ frame; per the code-vs-instruction note, the absence of code is not penalized when guidance is this concrete.

Workflow Clarity

The sequence is clear (check files, repo-scout, ask one question at a time, build the FAQ, deliver) with explicit validation checkpoints and fallbacks: "have the champion confirm the command", the local file as "a consent stop", "show it first, and write it only after the champion says yes", "If AskUserQuestion isn't available...", and "If it returns anything other than one exact entry, treat it as none".

Progressive Disclosure

The roughly 35-line body has two well-organized sections ("## Start here", "## Then"), no bundle files exist, and all guidance fits inline with no nested references — under the under-50-lines exception, well-organized sections alone warrant a 5.

Specificity

"Turn repeat questions into a pinned FAQ" names the domain and exactly one concrete action, matching the anchor for 1-2 concrete actions rather than the several specific actions required for a 4 or 5.

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ("Turn repeat questions into a pinned FAQ") and when ("Use when a champion keeps answering the same questions") with a concrete trigger phrase, matching the anchor-5 pattern exactly; it is not a 4 because the when-clause is already explicit and specific.

Trigger Term Quality

"repeat questions", "FAQ", and "keeps answering the same questions" are natural phrases a user in this situation would say, though common synonyms like "frequently asked questions" or "common questions" are absent — good coverage with a few natural terms missing, matching 4 rather than comprehensive coverage at 5.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

"pinned FAQ" combined with the champion scenario forms a clear niche with a distinct trigger, but FAQ/document creation could still overlap with general documentation or onboarding skills — mostly distinct with minor overlap risk, matching 4 rather than the minimal-conflict anchor at 5.