Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a tightly written instruction skill: concrete options and defaults, explicit consent gates for the one risky action (calendar event creation), and clean section structure with no padding. The only real gaps are slight redundancy in consent rules and thinner guidance for the agenda and write-up paths compared to setup.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and imperative with no concept explanation ('Ask people to bring a task, not a topic'), but consent-handling rules appear in both the asking-protocol paragraph and the closing safety paragraph, so a little trimming is possible. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives exact AskUserQuestion options with recommended-first ordering, concrete defaults (Thursday at 2pm, champion's timezone), an exact event field spec, and explicit fallbacks (numbered list without the tool; paste-ready details without a calendar connector) — fully executable guidance for an instruction-only skill. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The setup branch is clearly sequenced with an explicit consent checkpoint ('show the exact event... Create it only after "Create it"'), but the agenda and write-up branches are thin and there is no error-recovery feedback loop, so it falls just short of anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines, needs no external references, and is organized into clear sections (Start here, Then, background), which merits a 5 under the simple-skill exception. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |