Content
58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and exceptionally well-sequenced with validation feedback loops, but it is far too verbose — heavy internal repetition and conceptual padding — and fails to split its bulk into reference files, leaving navigation poor and one reference dangling.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated sensitivity-table, scenario-block, and cell-comment guidance into a single authoritative section; remove the duplicated restatements across Critical Constraints, correct_patterns, and common_mistakes.
Move the large formatting/border/number-format standards and the detailed sensitivity-table implementation into separate reference files (e.g. FORMATTING.md, SENSITIVITY.md) and link to them one level deep, turning SKILL.md into an overview.
Fix or remove the broken ./TROUBLESHOOTING.md reference and actually wire up the bundled scripts/validate_dcf.py from the body so the existing bundle is used instead of only the external xlsx skill's recalc.py.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | At ~1263 lines the body is noticeably verbose with substantial duplication: sensitivity-table instructions are restated ~4 times, scenario-block structure ~4 times, cell-comment format ~3 times, and WACC formulas appear in multiple places, plus the common_mistakes section restates constraints already in Critical Constraints — even if much is domain-specific rather than filler. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance — exact cell references (e.g. '=E29*(1+$E$10)'), full sheet-structure CSV templates, and code patterns — with only minor gaps such as pseudocode placeholders like '=<DCF recalc using {wacc_value} and {term_growth_value}>' instead of a complete sensitivity formula. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 10-step DCF workflow with explicit validation checkpoints and feedback loops (verify-with-user after each stage, terminal-value 50-70% sanity check, sensitivity center-cell = base-case check, 're-run recalc.py until status is success') — matching the top anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is a monolithic single 1263-line file; large blocks (assumption-table structure, sensitivity-table implementation, formatting standards) clearly belong in separate reference files, the only body reference './TROUBLESHOOTING.md' is a broken link (file absent), and the bundled scripts/validate_dcf.py is never referenced from the body. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |