Content
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a well-sequenced, validation-rich workflow and genuine domain-specific knowledge Claude lacks. Its weaknesses are conciseness (length plus redundant/self-contained code) and progressive disclosure (most detail lives inline rather than in reference files).
Suggestions
Move the detailed slide design specification (color palette, typography, table-centering math) and/or the logo-generation pipeline into separate reference files so SKILL.md reads as a lean overview pointing one level deep, lifting progressive_disclosure toward 3.
Tighten the Step 6 logo code: keep the simple-icons lookup strategy and brand-color injection specifics, but drop the boilerplate sharp/SVG code Claude can readily produce, reducing the conciseness burden.
Consolidate the AI-generated disclaimer — currently stated in the header, the footer line, and the design footer — into a single mandatory instruction to remove redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and operational (Capital IQ failure modes, aliases, exact tool params Claude lacks), but at ~510 lines it includes a full self-contained logo-generation pipeline and repeats the AI disclaimer three times, so it does not meet the "every token earns its place" bar of score 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully executable guidance throughout — exact API calls with parameters, pptxgenjs code with concrete colW arrays and a table-centering formula, the Capital IQ URL template, and QA commands (markitdown, soffice, pdftoppm) — matching the copy-paste-ready score-3 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Nine clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation checkpoints (Rule 0 pre-validation, per-batch empty-result checks, Step 8 "Fix and re-verify" cycle), satisfying the feedback-loop anchor rather than the validation-gap score-2 anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The one reference present (references/sector-seeds.md) is real, well-signaled, and one level deep, but the bulk of the content — the slide design spec, the logo pipeline, and the entity-resolution rules — is inline in a monolithic 500-line SKILL.md rather than split into reference files, matching the "content that should be separate is inline" score-2 anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |