Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a tight, actionable, well-sequenced extraction workflow that assumes Claude's competence and adds a justified untrusted-input warning. It fully satisfies conciseness, actionability, workflow, and disclosure for a skill of this size.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and functional — an inventory table, an exact JSON schema, and gap-flagging rules — with no padding explaining what KYC, a passport, or source-of-funds means. It is not level 2 because there is no unnecessary explanation to trim. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives a copy-paste-ready JSON record with concrete field names and types, explicit guidance ("Use null for any field not found — do not guess"), and a clear gap-checklist with thresholds ("address proof older than 3 months"). It is not level 2 because the guidance is complete and executable, not pseudocode. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three steps are explicitly sequenced (inventory → extract → flag gaps) with a verification checkpoint in Step 3 that checks expiry and age before handing to the rules engine. It is not level 2 because a checkpoint with explicit pass/fail criteria is present; the operation is read-only extraction so the destructive-operation cap does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A single-purpose skill under 50 lines with no bundle files, organized into clearly headed sections and an input-safety note — matching the rubric's allowance for simple skills to score 3 on good organization alone. It is not level 2 because the structure is well-organized with no nested or missing references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |