Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, security-aware instruction skill with concrete decision logic and a clear output schema, structured into well-signaled steps. The main gap is the absence of explicit feedback-loop guidance for upstream or screening failures.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and dense throughout — no re-teaching of KYC/AML concepts, a compact factor table, and a non-obvious trust-boundary callout that earns its tokens; every section pulls its weight. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete guidance via a field-to-scoring factor table, an output JSON schema with enum values, and an explicit 'clear only if' routing rule; falls short of a 5 only because rule-outcome generation depends on an external grid with no worked example. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear four-step sequence with an explicit gating checkpoint for 'clear' in Step 4, but no feedback loop for upstream or screening-MCP failures keeps it below the anchor-5 bar. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed steps with a table and code block, no nested references, and the large external source (the rules grid) is appropriately externalized to the screening MCP or a provided file; no bundle files exist to require further splitting. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |