Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is concise and well-structured with a clear workflow, but actionability and workflow clarity are held back by blank template tables, a non-executable IRR method, and missing validation checkpoints for the batch output.
Suggestions
Add an executable IRR solver (e.g., a Python snippet using numpy.irr/financial or an Excel RATE/XIRR formula) so returns are computable rather than templated.
Insert a validation step after Step 2/3 to sanity-check results (e.g., confirm MOIC and IRR are internally consistent, flag negative or implausible IRR values).
Populate at least one example sensitivity cell or base-case row with sample numbers to make the tables actionable templates rather than empty shells.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining finance concepts it already knows. Every section earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides blank template tables and high-level formulas (MOIC, IRR, attribution) but no executable method for actually solving IRR or populating cells, leaving key computational detail missing. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step sequence is present, but a modeling/batch deliverable lacks explicit validation checkpoints (e.g., sanity-check IRR/MOIC, cross-foot the waterfall), capping workflow clarity per the batch-operation guideline. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Single self-contained SKILL.md with well-organized sections and no nested or buried references; minor opportunity to split large sensitivity templates into a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |