Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, lean instructional skill: a clear six-step workflow with concrete templates, metrics, and output specs, and no bundle-file overhead. The main gaps are the absence of explicit validation checkpoints inside the workflow and no data-sourcing guidance.
Suggestions
Embed validation as explicit workflow checkpoints (e.g., after Step 2: 'Verify every market size figure has a named source or methodology before proceeding') instead of leaving all quality checks in the trailing Important Notes section.
Add brief data-sourcing guidance (which databases or research-firm reports to pull market share and multiples from, and what to do when figures conflict or are stale) to close the actionability gap.
Move the company-profile template table and output-format specification into a references/ file (e.g., REPORT_TEMPLATE.md) to keep SKILL.md a lean overview and strengthen progressive disclosure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a dense bulleted checklist with no fluff sentences or concept explanations, matching anchor 4's 'efficient; minor instances that could be trimmed'. It falls short of 5 because items like "Valuation snapshot (P/E, EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue)" and "Business description (2-3 sentences)" restate what a competent model already knows about sector report structure. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete specifics are provided: a company-comparison table with named columns, page-count guidance ("5-10 pages" vs "20-30 pages"), named chart types ("market size waterfall, competitive positioning matrix, valuation scatter plot"), and output formats (Word/PowerPoint plus Excel appendix). Anchor 5 is not reached because there is no guidance on data sourcing/retrieval or a worked example of any section, leaving minor execution gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The six numbered steps (Define Scope through Output) form a clear, logical sequence with decision inputs pinned in Step 1 and the deliverable specified in Step 6. It is not 5 because validation is not embedded in the flow: checks like "Source all market size data" and "note the date and flag data that may be stale" live in a trailing Important Notes section rather than as explicit checkpoints, so they are implicit rather than sequenced. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist (references/, scripts/, assets/ are absent), and the single ~85-line file is well organized with a clear step hierarchy and a separate Important Notes section, matching anchor 4's 'good structure; most content appropriately placed'. Not 5 because it slightly exceeds the compact single-file range where a fully self-contained skill scores top marks, and the company-profile template and output specification could arguably live in a reference file. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |