Content
67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body presents a clear four-step methodology with actionable checklists and a concrete output template, but the decorative ASCII diagram inflates token cost without adding guidance. Adding an explicit fix-verification step and flattening the diagram would raise workflow clarity and conciseness.
Suggestions
Replace the 24-line ASCII box with a flat numbered list of the four steps and their checkmarks — the box is decorative padding that costs ~20 lines without adding guidance (conciseness).
Add an explicit validation step after FIX, e.g. 'Re-run the reproduction to confirm the fix resolves it; if not, return to Step 3' — this closes the workflow's only checkpoint gap (workflow_clarity).
Trim the Tips section or fold it into the description's trigger examples, since 'share error messages exactly' and 'mention what changed' largely restate content already surfaced (conciseness).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The 24-line ASCII box diagram ("│ Step 1: REPRODUCE │ ...") conveys nothing beyond what a flat four-item list would, and the 'Tips' section partly repeats the description's trigger phrases; the rest is efficient, so this sits at 'could be tightened' rather than anchor 4's only-minor-trimming. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete per-step checklists ("Check recent changes (deploys, config changes, dependencies)", "Review logs and error messages") plus a copy-paste output template make the guidance mostly executable; directives like "Form hypotheses and test them" remain high-level, keeping it below the fully concrete anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four clearly numbered steps with implicit checkpoints ("Consider side effects and edge cases", "Suggest tests to prevent regression") give a clear sequence with most checkpoints present; the missing explicit 're-run the reproduction to verify the fix' step is the minor validation gap that distinguishes this from anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are well-organized under clear headers with the single external reference (CONNECTORS.md) clearly signaled at the top; at ~90 body lines the under-50-line simple-skill exception does not apply, and the inlined ASCII diagram and full output template are content that could live more granularly, fitting 'good structure with minor organization gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |