Content
58%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A cleanly organized orientation workflow with clear sequencing and a sensible external reference. Its main weakness is actionability: the central instruction to check connected MCP servers lacks a concrete mechanism, and the placeholder notation is left unexplained.
Suggestions
Specify how to detect connected MCP servers (e.g., the exact tool-listing command or call) rather than only saying 'list available tools'.
Explain or strip the '~~' strikethrough placeholders in the server lists so the displayed text is unambiguous.
Add an explicit checkpoint after Step 2 confirming that missing servers were reported before moving to skills.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and action-oriented with no concept re-explanation; the verbatim welcome block and skill table earn their tokens, though the welcome text is slightly long. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete outputs (grouped server lists, skill table, real install URLs) but 'Test which MCP servers are connected by listing available tools' gives no actual mechanism or command, and the unexplained '~~' strikethrough placeholders are an incomplete detail. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence with implicit checkpoints ('Report which servers are connected and which are not yet set up', 'Wait for the user's response'), falling short of fully explicit validation. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with one clearly signaled one-level-deep reference ([CONNECTORS.md](../../CONNECTORS.md)); no bundle files exist, so structure carries the score with minor gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |