CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ux-copy

Write or review UX copy — microcopy, error messages, empty states, CTAs. Trigger with "write copy for", "what should this button say?", "review this error message", or when naming a CTA, wording a confirmation dialog, filling an empty state, or writing onboarding text.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its scope (UX copy), lists specific content types it handles, and provides rich, natural trigger phrases that users would actually say. It uses proper third-person voice and is concise yet comprehensive. It serves as a near-ideal example of a well-crafted skill description.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Write or review UX copy — microcopy, error messages, empty states, CTAs.' These are distinct, well-defined content types that clearly communicate what the skill does.

3 / 3

Completeness

Clearly answers both 'what' (write or review UX copy including microcopy, error messages, empty states, CTAs) and 'when' (explicit trigger phrases and scenarios like naming a CTA, wording a confirmation dialog, etc.).

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would actually say: 'write copy for', 'what should this button say?', 'review this error message', 'naming a CTA', 'wording a confirmation dialog', 'filling an empty state', 'writing onboarding text'. These are highly natural phrases.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clearly occupies a distinct niche — UX copy and microcopy — with specific triggers like 'button say', 'error message', 'confirmation dialog', 'empty state' that are unlikely to conflict with general writing or coding skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Implementation

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a solid UX copy skill with strong actionability — the copy patterns with concrete structures (What happened + Why + How to fix) and specific examples are its greatest strength. The output template is well-defined and immediately usable. Weaknesses include some unnecessary explanation of writing principles Claude already knows, and several stub sections (Tooltips, Loading States, Onboarding) that add little value in their current form.

Suggestions

Remove or drastically shorten the Principles section — Claude already knows to write clearly and concisely; focus on domain-specific UX copy guidance instead.

Flesh out the stub patterns (Tooltips, Loading States, Onboarding) with the same structure+example format used for CTAs and Error Messages, or remove them to save tokens.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The principles section states things Claude already knows about good writing (clear, concise, consistent, useful, human). The 'What I Need From You' section is somewhat unnecessary as Claude can infer needed context. However, the copy patterns section is efficient and adds genuine value with its structured formulas.

2 / 3

Actionability

The copy patterns provide concrete, specific formulas with real examples (error message structure, CTA patterns, empty state structure, confirmation dialog guidance). The output template is fully specified with a markdown table format. This is directly usable guidance for generating UX copy.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

For a single-task skill (writing/reviewing UX copy), the workflow is clear: gather context → apply principles and patterns → produce structured output with alternatives and rationale. The output template provides an unambiguous sequence of deliverables. No destructive or batch operations require validation checkpoints.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-structured with clear sections, but some patterns (Tooltips, Loading States, Onboarding) are stub-like with only a few words each — they should either be fleshed out inline or removed. The reference to CONNECTORS.md is appropriate, but there are no bundle files to support deeper content. The skill is slightly too long for what it delivers, with some sections that could be consolidated.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

90%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation10 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

10

/

11

Passed

Repository
anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.