Write or review UX copy — microcopy, error messages, empty states, CTAs. Trigger with "write copy for", "what should this button say?", "review this error message", or when naming a CTA, wording a confirmation dialog, filling an empty state, or writing onboarding text.
72
88%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Quality
Discovery
100%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
This is a strong skill description that clearly defines its scope (UX copy), lists specific content types it handles, and provides rich, natural trigger phrases that users would actually say. It uses proper third-person voice and is concise yet comprehensive. It serves as a near-ideal example of a well-crafted skill description.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Lists multiple specific concrete actions: 'Write or review UX copy — microcopy, error messages, empty states, CTAs.' These are distinct, well-defined content types that clearly communicate what the skill does. | 3 / 3 |
Completeness | Clearly answers both 'what' (write or review UX copy including microcopy, error messages, empty states, CTAs) and 'when' (explicit trigger phrases and scenarios like naming a CTA, wording a confirmation dialog, etc.). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Excellent coverage of natural trigger terms users would actually say: 'write copy for', 'what should this button say?', 'review this error message', 'naming a CTA', 'wording a confirmation dialog', 'filling an empty state', 'writing onboarding text'. These are highly natural phrases. | 3 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | Clearly occupies a distinct niche — UX copy and microcopy — with specific triggers like 'button say', 'error message', 'confirmation dialog', 'empty state' that are unlikely to conflict with general writing or coding skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
77%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a solid UX copy skill with strong actionability — the copy patterns with concrete structures (What happened + Why + How to fix) and specific examples are its greatest strength. The output template is well-defined and immediately usable. Weaknesses include some unnecessary explanation of writing principles Claude already knows, and several stub sections (Tooltips, Loading States, Onboarding) that add little value in their current form.
Suggestions
Remove or drastically shorten the Principles section — Claude already knows to write clearly and concisely; focus on domain-specific UX copy guidance instead.
Flesh out the stub patterns (Tooltips, Loading States, Onboarding) with the same structure+example format used for CTAs and Error Messages, or remove them to save tokens.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The principles section states things Claude already knows about good writing (clear, concise, consistent, useful, human). The 'What I Need From You' section is somewhat unnecessary as Claude can infer needed context. However, the copy patterns section is efficient and adds genuine value with its structured formulas. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | The copy patterns provide concrete, specific formulas with real examples (error message structure, CTA patterns, empty state structure, confirmation dialog guidance). The output template is fully specified with a markdown table format. This is directly usable guidance for generating UX copy. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | For a single-task skill (writing/reviewing UX copy), the workflow is clear: gather context → apply principles and patterns → produce structured output with alternatives and rationale. The output template provides an unambiguous sequence of deliverables. No destructive or batch operations require validation checkpoints. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The content is well-structured with clear sections, but some patterns (Tooltips, Loading States, Onboarding) are stub-like with only a few words each — they should either be fleshed out inline or removed. The reference to CONNECTORS.md is appropriate, but there are no bundle files to support deeper content. The skill is slightly too long for what it delivers, with some sections that could be consolidated. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Validation
90%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 10 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
| Criteria | Description | Result |
|---|---|---|
frontmatter_unknown_keys | Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata | Warning |
Total | 10 / 11 Passed | |
3bf5929
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.