Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, lean instruction-only skill: a clear workflow with embedded checkpoints, concrete probing questions and examples, tight scope boundaries, and exemplary progressive disclosure that pushes the full catalog to a single well-signaled reference file. Remaining improvements are small — trimming the duplicated framing/version info and tightening the Tone section.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes competence — probing questions, tier definitions, and scope boundaries are all operational guidance, not background explanation — but minor trims exist: the skill version duplicates the frontmatter metadata, and the Tone section restates the framing already given in Purpose and Goal ("A workload exhibiting multiple anti-patterns may still be productive" appears nearly verbatim in both). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance throughout: specific questions to ask when examining the workload ("Are action weights fixed, uniform, or varied per-run?", "Do payload sizes span orders of magnitude?"), a worked good-vs-bad finding example ("runs where only deletes fire would test behavior with zero keys"), tier definitions with examples, and an explicit three-part report structure. Minor gaps only — e.g., no guidance on handling very large workloads or the user-provided documentation mentioned in Purpose. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear six-step sequence (locate workload → read reference → examine → build findings → tier → present report) with checkpoints present: "If the workload location isn't obvious, ask the user" and presenting the reviewer's workload model first "so the user can correct misunderstandings before reading findings", plus explicit instruction to flag findings requiring domain judgment. This is a read-only analysis skill, so the destructive/batch validation cap does not apply; it falls just short of the anchor-5 feedback-loop level. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a genuine overview and the full anti-pattern catalog is correctly split into a single one-level-deep reference (`references/anti-patterns.md`, verified to exist and organized by Action Selection / Data Generation / Structural-Timing categories), clearly signaled twice — in Workflow step 2 with what it contains, and in a Reference Files table with when to read it. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |