Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with concrete commands, clear branching, and good progressive disclosure that delegates per-locale detail to separate files. Minor room to tighten prose and make the validation retry loop explicit.
Suggestions
Make the validation feedback loop explicit: after the completeness check, state 'if any value is non-zero, return to translating/fixing and re-run until 0 missing, 0 TODOs, 0 unused, 100% coverage'.
Tighten explanatory prose such as 'Consistency with established translations is critical' into imperative guidance ('Reuse existing translations exactly').
Add 'localization' / 'l10n' as trigger synonyms in the description to broaden natural keyword coverage.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Efficient and mostly free of padding — no explaining of what i18n or JSON is — but a few prose sentences ('Consistency with established translations is critical') could be tightened further. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready commands (breeze ui check-translation-completeness --language <locale> --add-missing, prek run --from-ref main) and concrete config snippets for every file that needs editing. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear branching sequence (determine task -> add/update -> validation) with explicit validation checkpoints (0 missing/0 TODO/0 unused/100% coverage, pre-commit), though the validate->fix->retry feedback loop is implied rather than spelled out. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized overview with global rules inline and per-locale detail split into clearly signaled one-level-deep references via the locale guideline table. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |