Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, actionable investigation workflow with executable commands and valuable non-obvious domain notes (profile exporter mock-provider failure). Merging the two overlapping 'clean OAP logs' notes and making step 4 more concrete would push it higher.
Suggestions
Consolidate the last two Notes (profile exporter + 'OAP logs clean but tests fail') into one to remove redundancy and improve conciseness.
Replace the vague step 4 with a concrete command (e.g., a find/grep pattern for BanyanDB/UI pod logs) to close the actionability gap.
Add a brief validation checkpoint after extraction (e.g., confirm artifact.zip is non-empty before unzip) to strengthen workflow clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean command-first body with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, but the last two Notes overlap (both cover 'OAP logs clean while tests fail'), a minor redundancy that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Steps 1-3 give copy-paste-ready gh/unzip/find/grep commands; step 4 ('Check BanyanDB, UI, and other pod logs as needed') and the <log_file> placeholder leave minor gaps keeping it below 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (find artifact, download/extract, inspect OAP logs, inspect others, report) with concrete commands; lacks explicit validation/error-recovery checkpoints, but the read-only investigation context limits that impact. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, no external references needed, and well-organized into ## Steps and ## Notes sections, satisfying the simple-skill exception for a 5. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |