Jira integration via Apideck's Issue Tracking unified API — same methods work across every connector in Issue Tracking, switch by changing `serviceId`. Use when the user wants to read, write, or comment on tickets and issues in Jira. Routes through Apideck with serviceId "jira".
83
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
Access Jira through Apideck's Issue Tracking unified API — one of 6 Issue Tracking connectors that share the same method surface. Code you write here ports to GitHub, GitLab, Linear and 2 other Issue Tracking connectors by changing a single serviceId string. Apideck handles auth, pagination, rate limiting, and retries so you don't write per-tenant Jira plumbing.
Beta connector. Jira is currently in beta on Apideck. Expect partial resource coverage and occasional mapping gaps. Always verify coverage (see below) and fall back to the Proxy API for unsupported operations.
jiraActivate this skill when the user explicitly wants to work with Jira — for example, "create a ticket in Jira" or "comment on an issue in Jira". This skill teaches the agent:
serviceId to pass on every call (jira)For the full method surface (parameters, pagination, filtering), use your language SDK skill:
apideck-node, apideck-python, apideck-dotnet, apideck-java, apideck-go, apideck-php, or apideck-restFor the raw OpenAPI spec:
import { Apideck } from "@apideck/unify";
const apideck = new Apideck({
apiKey: process.env.APIDECK_API_KEY,
appId: process.env.APIDECK_APP_ID,
consumerId: "your-consumer-id",
});
// List tickets in Jira
const { data } = await apideck.issueTracking.tickets.list({
serviceId: "jira",
});The Apideck Issue Tracking unified API exposes the same methods for every connector in its catalog. Switching from Jira to another Issue Tracking connector is a one-string change — no rewrite, no new SDK.
// Today — Jira
await apideck.issueTracking.tickets.list({ serviceId: "jira" });
// Tomorrow — same code, different connector
await apideck.issueTracking.tickets.list({ serviceId: "github" });
await apideck.issueTracking.tickets.list({ serviceId: "gitlab" });This is the compounding advantage of using Apideck over integrating Jira directly: code against the unified Issue Tracking API once, gain access to every connector in it. New connectors Apideck adds become available to your app without code changes.
Jira Cloud is the reference Issue Tracking connector. Covers issues (tickets), projects (collections), comments, and users.
| Jira concept | Apideck Issue Tracking resource |
|---|---|
| Project | collections |
| Issue | tickets |
| Comment | comments |
| User | users |
| Label | tags |
| Issue type (Story, Bug, Task) | ticket.type |
| Status (To Do, In Progress, Done) | ticket.status |
| Priority | ticket.priority |
| Assignee | ticket.assignees[] |
| Custom fields | ticket.custom_fields[] |
| Epic link, Sprint | use Proxy or custom fields |
| Worklog (time tracking) | use Proxy |
| Jira Service Desk tickets | ❌ separate auth-only connector |
filter[jql])custom_fields[]; write values must match Jira's expected typedescription and comment bodies. Apideck accepts plain text or Markdown and transforms to ADF on write; on read, ADF is flattened to plain text in ticket.description. For rich content, use raw=true to see ADF directly.PROJ-123 and numeric ID). Apideck accepts either on read; writes return both.ticket.status = "Done" triggers the right transition if one exists.startAt/maxResults. Apideck normalizes to cursor-based pagination.Tickets in the Issue Tracking API are nested under a collection (project). See apideck-node for the canonical method signature — typically requires collectionId.
const { data } = await apideck.issueTracking.collectionTickets.create({
serviceId: "jira",
collectionId: "10001", // Jira project ID
ticket: {
title: "Login button fails on Safari",
description: "Repro: open Safari 17, click login. Nothing happens.",
type: "Bug",
priority: "High",
assignees: [{ id: "5b10a2844c20165700ede21g" }],
tags: [{ name: "safari" }, { name: "regression" }],
},
});The unified Issue Tracking API supports basic filters, but complex JQL isn't exposed. Use the Proxy for full JQL:
curl 'https://unify.apideck.com/proxy' \
-H "Authorization: Bearer ${APIDECK_API_KEY}" \
-H "x-apideck-app-id: ${APIDECK_APP_ID}" \
-H "x-apideck-consumer-id: ${CONSUMER_ID}" \
-H "x-apideck-service-id: jira" \
-H "x-apideck-downstream-url: /rest/api/3/search?jql=project%20%3D%20PROJ" \
-H "x-apideck-downstream-method: GET"In Jira you don't PUT a status — you POST a transition. Apideck's update with ticket.status = "Done" triggers the matching workflow transition if one exists. If the transition isn't auto-resolvable, use Proxy with /rest/api/3/issue/{id}/transitions.
await apideck.issueTracking.collectionTickets.update({
serviceId: "jira",
collectionId: "10001",
ticketId: "10042",
ticket: { status: "Done" },
});Other Issue Tracking connectors that share this unified API surface (same method signatures, just change serviceId):
github (beta), gitlab (beta), linear (beta), gitlab-server (beta), linear-multiworkspace (beta).
apideck-connector-coverage — programmatic coverage checksapideck-best-practices — architecture, Vault, pagination, error handlingapideck-node — TypeScript / Node SDK patterns9e04d86
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.