Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable skill body with excellent progressive disclosure into a verified two-file bundle and an explicit self-check workflow. Its single weakness is redundancy: the composition flexibility and density guidance each recur across multiple sections and could be consolidated to save tokens.
Suggestions
Consolidate the repeated composition-flexibility guidance: Preflight item 6 ("it is not a closed template menu, and a fresh composition is welcome") and the Canvas Grammar composition bullet ("Treat this as a guide, not a closed composition") say the same thing — keep one, ideally in the Canvas Grammar bullet where the 3-4 chunk starting point lives.
Unify density guidance: the 3-4 chunks / 5-6 rows starting point appears in Preflight item 4, the Canvas Grammar composition bullet, and the Repair priority ladder; state the starting point once and let the Repair section reference it instead of restating chunk definitions.
Tighten the vertical-rhythm bullet by splitting its long parentheticals (e.g., the flex-1/justify-between caveat and the nonzero-gap rule) into short separate bullets so each rule scans in one pass.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly prescriptive rules rather than explanation of known concepts, but the same guidance repeats in several places — "not a closed template menu / fresh composition is welcome" appears in both Preflight item 6 and the Canvas Grammar composition bullet, and density/composition guidance recurs across Preflight item 4, the Canvas Grammar bullets, and the Repair priority ladder. The long parentheticals in the vertical-rhythm bullet could also be tightened. Not 4 because the redundancy is more than minor trimming. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is fully concrete for an instruction-only skill: exact pixel budgets (96-176px padding, 220-420px hook, 120-260px takeaway), exact font floors with usable syntax ("text-[33px]", "data-ppt-density=\"high\"", "@ppt-chart-height=N"), named patterns, and a four-step priority ladder for resolving density. Not below 5 because every inline rule is specific and directly executable when writing the page. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The usage sequence is clear (Preflight decisions → Note Budget calculation → write → Repair And Self-check), repair items are condition→fix feedback loops, and validation is explicit via "Before delivery, run references/checklist.md" plus the P0/P1/P2 checklist. Not 4 because checkpoints are explicit rather than implicit. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The ~80-line body is an overview that delegates detail to two real, one-level-deep reference files, each clearly signaled with its content ("named red-note patterns and 1242x1660 zone skeletons", "P0/P1/P2 structural self-check") and re-referenced at point of use. Both files exist in references/ and contain no further nested references. Not 4 because navigation and placement are clean with no inline content that belongs in the bundle. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |