standard-4-3-layout-skill

Must be read before creating, relaying out, or repairing standard 4:3 Oh My PPT pages. Defines square-ish presentation layout, two-zone and 2x2 structures, chart/table budgeting, column discipline, plus catalog and checklist references for 1600x1200 canvases.

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a tight, actionable overview that delegates depth to clearly signaled reference files, with concrete numeric guidance, sequenced workflows, and an explicit pre-delivery self-check validation step.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and well-structured with bullets, a lookup table, and budget lists; it assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows, with every section (Preflight, Canvas Grammar, Height And Width Budget, Repair) earning its place.	3 / 3
Actionability	Guidance is concrete and specific despite being instruction-only: exact font floors (24px/32px/16px) with Tailwind class equivalents, padding/title/footer px ranges, named patterns, and the `@ppt-chart-height=N` marker aligned with `h-[Npx]`; the scoring note permits absence of code for actionable instruction-only skills.	3 / 3
Workflow Clarity	Clear sequenced workflows (Preflight 1-6, Height And Width Budget 1-6) with an explicit validation checkpoint ('Before delivery, run `references/checklist.md`') and a conditional Repair section providing feedback loops for error recovery.	3 / 3
Progressive Disclosure	SKILL.md is a concise overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references to real files (`references/catalog.md`, `references/checklist.md`), each described inline; the Pattern Quick Lookup table summarizes catalog patterns and points to the catalog for the full recipe.	3 / 3
	Total	12 / 12 Passed

Description

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-3

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, distinctive, and complete with explicit when-guidance, but its imperative/passive opening voice and reliance on product jargon ('Oh My PPT') slightly weaken trigger-term naturalness and voice compliance.

Suggestions

Rewrite the opening in third-person declarative voice (e.g., 'Defines layout for standard 4:3 Oh My PPT pages...') and add an explicit 'Use when creating, relaying out, or repairing...' clause to improve trigger naturalness and voice compliance.

Soften product jargon like 'Oh My PPT' with user-facing terms (e.g., '4:3 presentation slides') so natural user phrasing maps to the skill.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Lists concrete actions and areas ('creating, relaying out, or repairing', 'two-zone and 2x2 structures, chart/table budgeting, column discipline'), which would warrant a 3, but the opening 'Must be read before creating...' is imperative/passive rather than third-person declarative voice, triggering the rubric's one-point specificity penalty.	2 / 3
Completeness	Explicitly states what it does ('Defines square-ish presentation layout...') and when to apply it ('Must be read before creating, relaying out, or repairing standard 4:3 Oh My PPT pages'), satisfying both the 'what' and 'when' with equivalent explicit trigger guidance.	3 / 3
Trigger Term Quality	Relevant keywords exist ('4:3', 'presentation layout', 'charts/tables', '1600x1200'), but 'Oh My PPT' is product jargon and the phrasing 'Must be read before creating, relaying out, or repairing' is an instruction to Claude rather than natural user trigger terms, missing common variations.	2 / 3
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche is narrow and specific ('standard 4:3 Oh My PPT pages', '1600x1200 canvases'), giving it distinct triggers unlikely to overlap with or fire for unrelated skills.	3 / 3
	Total	10 / 12 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: arcsin1/oh-my-ppt
Path: resources/skills/standard-4-3-layout-skill/SKILL.md
Commit: d2046bf

Reviewed: 11 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.