Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-sectioned overview whose inline content (file map, architecture, quick-reference snippet) is efficient and largely actionable. However, both of its referenced deep-dive files are missing from the bundle, which breaks progressive disclosure and leaves the skill's core use case — implementing a new cross-version API method — without actionable steps.
Suggestions
Create the missing referenced files (e.g. references/api-differences.md and references/patterns.md) or remove the references from the body so navigation isn't broken.
Add a short numbered workflow for the primary task: which adapter to extend, how to map a v2 endpoint to its v3 equivalent (via api-differences), and how to register/expose the new method.
Make the Quick Reference snippet executable by showing the import or context that provides _get_adapter(), so it is copy-paste ready.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The ~30-line body is lean: an architecture flow, a file map, and a short code snippet, with zero explanation of concepts Claude already knows. Every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The Quick Reference ("adapter = _get_adapter()", "adapter.list_dags(limit=100)", "adapter.trigger_dag_run(...)") and the Key Files list are concrete, but the code is not standalone-executable ("_get_adapter()" is undefined here) and the primary use case from the description — adding a new API method — has no implementation guidance because @patterns.md does not exist in the bundle. Below anchor 4 because key details for the main task are missing; above anchor 2 because real, specific guidance exists. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The architecture arrow-flow ("MCP Tool → _get_adapter() → AirflowV2Adapter or AirflowV3Adapter → Airflow API") plus "Version is auto-detected at startup" conveys the call sequence, but there are no steps or checkpoints for the skill's stated purpose of adding a new cross-version method, and validation guidance is absent. Not 4 because the explicit sequence for the actual task is missing; not 2 because the architecture shown is coherent. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is cleanly sectioned and points to two one-level-deep references (@api-differences.md, @patterns.md), but neither file — nor any references/ directory — exists in the bundle, so the references are broken; the '@' prefix is also not a clearly signaled link format. Below anchor 3 because navigation fails outright, not merely under-signaled; above anchor 1 because the in-body structure itself is well organized. | 2 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |