Comprehensive DAG failure diagnosis and root cause analysis. Use for complex debugging requests requiring deep investigation like "diagnose and fix the pipeline", "full root cause analysis", "why is this failing and how to prevent it". For simple debugging ("why did dag fail", "show logs"), the airflow entrypoint skill handles it directly. This skill provides structured investigation and prevention recommendations.
68
83%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
—
No eval scenarios have been run
Passed
No known issues
You are a data engineer debugging a failed Airflow DAG. Follow this systematic approach to identify the root cause and provide actionable remediation.
These commands assume af is on PATH. Run via astro otto to get it automatically, or install standalone with uv tool install astro-airflow-mcp.
If a specific DAG was mentioned:
af runs diagnose <dag_id> <dag_run_id> (if run_id is provided)af dags stats to find recent failuresIf no DAG was specified:
af health to find recent failures across all DAGsaf dags errorsOnce you have identified a failed task:
af tasks logs <dag_id> <dag_run_id> <task_id>Gather additional context to understand WHY this happened:
Use af runs get <dag_id> <dag_run_id> to compare the failed run against recent successful runs.
A common cause of failures with no git activity is dependency drift — the user's code didn't change, but a package they depend on did. Check in this order:
Worker image diff (preferred when available). Every Astro deploy = new image tag, so the registry has a "before" and "after". Diff pip freeze between current and previous image — that's ground truth for what changed:
docker run --rm <current_image> pip freeze > /tmp/now.txt
docker run --rm <previous_image> pip freeze > /tmp/prev.txt
diff /tmp/prev.txt /tmp/now.txtAlso compare docker run --rm <image> python --version between the two — a Python minor-version bump (3.11 → 3.12, or even a patch) can break wheel compatibility even when pip freeze looks identical. af config providers lists currently installed provider versions, useful for cross-checking against modules named in the traceback.
Venv-style operators bypass the worker image. @task.virtualenv, PythonVirtualenvOperator, ExternalPythonOperator, and KubernetesPodOperator build their environment per task run, so an image diff won't catch failures inside them. If the failed task is one of these, read its requirements / image / python_version / python args directly:
pandas>=2.0.0 with no upper bound, or no specifier at all) → a new upstream release is the prime suspect.image="foo:latest" or no tag → the image moved underneath you.python_version="3.11" (on @task.virtualenv / PythonVirtualenvOperator) or a python path (on ExternalPythonOperator) resolving to a different interpreter than it used to — a Python minor-version change can break wheel compatibility for unchanged requirements. Same vector applies to the worker image itself if the base Python changed there.Fix is to pin: pandas>=2.0.0,<3.0.0, a lockfile, a specific image SHA, or a fully-qualified Python version (python_version="3.11.7" instead of "3.11").
Index lookup when image diff isn't conclusive (no image history, or a venv-style operator). Identify the configured index first — it may not be PyPI:
UV_INDEX_URL, PIP_INDEX_URL, PIP_EXTRA_INDEX_URLpyproject.toml → [[tool.uv.index]]~/.pip/pip.conf, /etc/pip.confDockerfile --index-url flagsThen query for releases of the suspect package since the first failure started. PyPI:
curl -s https://pypi.org/pypi/<pkg>/json | jq '.releases | to_entries | map({version: .key, uploaded: .value[0].upload_time}) | sort_by(.uploaded) | reverse | .[:5]'Private indexes usually expose the same /pypi/<pkg>/json shape; fall back to the Simple API (/simple/<pkg>/) or ask the user if neither works.
A release timestamp landing between the last green run and the first red run, for a package named in the traceback, is the answer.
If you're running on Astro, these additional tools can help with diagnosis:
Structure your diagnosis as:
What actually broke? Be specific - not "the task failed" but "the task failed because column X was null in 15% of rows when the code expected 0%".
Specific steps to resolve RIGHT NOW:
How to prevent this from happening again:
Provide ready-to-use commands:
af runs clear <dag_id> <run_id>af tasks clear <dag_id> <run_id> <task_ids> -Daf runs delete <dag_id> <run_id>789b454
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.