Feishu permission management for documents and files. Activate when user mentions sharing, permissions, collaborators.
87
81%
Does it follow best practices?
Impact
96%
1.26xAverage score across 3 eval scenarios
Risky
Do not use without reviewing
Quality
Discovery
75%Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.
The description establishes a clear niche (Feishu permission management) and includes an explicit activation clause, which is good. However, it lacks specific concrete actions (e.g., grant, revoke, list collaborators) and could benefit from broader trigger term coverage to capture more natural user phrasings.
Suggestions
Add specific concrete actions such as 'grant access, revoke permissions, manage sharing links, list collaborators, set read/edit roles'.
Expand trigger terms to include natural variations like 'access control', 'invite', 'share link', 'read-only', 'edit access', 'who has access'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Specificity | Names the domain (Feishu permission management) and mentions documents and files, but doesn't list specific concrete actions like granting access, revoking permissions, listing collaborators, or changing sharing settings. | 2 / 3 |
Completeness | Answers both 'what' (Feishu permission management for documents and files) and 'when' with an explicit trigger clause ('Activate when user mentions sharing, permissions, collaborators'). | 3 / 3 |
Trigger Term Quality | Includes some relevant keywords ('sharing', 'permissions', 'collaborators') but misses common variations like 'access control', 'share link', 'invite', 'read-only', 'edit access', or 'Feishu docs'. | 2 / 3 |
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk | The combination of 'Feishu' and 'permission management' creates a clear niche that is unlikely to conflict with other skills, as it targets a specific platform and a specific functional area. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |
Implementation
87%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is a well-crafted, concise skill that provides fully actionable JSON examples and comprehensive reference tables for all parameter values. Its main weakness is the lack of validation/verification steps for what is acknowledged as a sensitive operation—there's no guidance on confirming permission changes succeeded or checking current state before making modifications.
Suggestions
Add a recommended workflow sequence for permission changes: list current collaborators first, make changes, then verify by listing again (validate -> act -> verify pattern).
Include guidance on error handling or what to do if a permission operation fails (e.g., invalid token, insufficient permissions).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is lean and efficient. It assumes Claude understands APIs and JSON payloads, avoids explaining what permissions or collaborators are, and every section serves a clear purpose with no filler text. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides fully concrete, copy-paste ready JSON payloads for each action (list, add, remove), complete reference tables for all parameter values (token types, member types, permission levels), and realistic examples with plausible token formats. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The three actions are clearly documented individually, but there's no explicit workflow sequence or validation guidance for permission management, which is explicitly noted as a sensitive operation. Missing feedback loops (e.g., verify after adding/removing, check current permissions before modifying) for what the skill itself acknowledges is a sensitive/destructive operation. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a skill of this scope (single tool, well-bounded functionality), the content is appropriately organized into clear sections—actions, reference tables, examples, and configuration—without needing external files. The structure supports easy scanning and discovery. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |
Validation
100%Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.
Validation — 11 / 11 Passed
Validation for skill structure
No warnings or errors.
b4fc4af
Table of Contents
If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.