CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

ideate

Timeboxed ideation on a topic using propose-and-critique subagent pairs. Use when the user wants to brainstorm, explore ideas, discover features, generate options, or think through possibilities for a specified duration. Triggers on requests like "brainstorm X for 30 minutes", "ideate on X", "spend an hour thinking about X", "what features should we build", "explore options for X".

72

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A highly actionable, clearly sequenced orchestrator skill with executable prompt templates and explicit clock-check checkpoints. Its only real weakness is redundancy: the keep-going-until-the-deadline message is restated in several sections and could be consolidated.

Suggestions

Consolidate the repeated clock-discipline guidance (Iron Law, Preventing Premature Exit table, Red Flags, Quick Reference) into a single authoritative section to reduce token cost while preserving the same constraint.

The Quick Reference table already restates termination/stall rules; ensure each redundancy is intentional cross-navigation rather than duplicated content.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Nearly all content is operational specifics Claude would not already know (dispatch loop, prompt templates, steering rules), but the clock-discipline message is restated across the Iron Law, Preventing Premature Exit table, Red Flags, and Quick Reference sections, which could be tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Concrete `date +%s` commands, an exact progress-file path template, full copy-paste-ready proposer and critic prompt blocks, structured output formats, and explicit tie-breaker rules give fully executable guidance.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 8-step sequence is clearly ordered with an explicit time-check validation checkpoint before every dispatch, a score-to-steering feedback loop, and a defined stall-recovery procedure with retry thresholds.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

No bundle files exist or are referenced, yet none are needed for this self-contained orchestration loop; the body is well-organized with headers, a process graph, and a Quick Reference table that serves as navigation.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Description

90%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-constructed description with explicit what/when structure and rich, natural trigger terms; written in correct third-person voice. Its only weakness is that it names one orchestration mechanism rather than a list of distinct concrete capabilities.

Suggestions

Consider naming one or two additional concrete outputs the skill produces (e.g., "rank and present the top-N ideas with scores and critiques") to lift specificity from a single mechanism to multiple concrete actions.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

It names the domain (ideation) and the core mechanism ("propose-and-critique subagent pairs", "timeboxed"), but describes one orchestration approach rather than enumerating multiple distinct concrete actions in the way the anchor-3 PDF example does.

2 / 3

Completeness

It clearly answers both what ("Timeboxed ideation...using propose-and-critique subagent pairs") and when ("Use when the user wants to brainstorm...Triggers on requests like..."), with explicit trigger guidance.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Strong coverage of natural terms users would say ("brainstorm", "explore ideas", "discover features", "generate options") plus realistic phrasings like "brainstorm X for 30 minutes" and "spend an hour thinking about X" that capture the timebox angle.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The propose-and-critique-subagent-pairs niche combined with timebox-specific triggers is clearly distinct from other skills and unlikely to fire for the wrong skill.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
av/harbor
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.