Content
92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong example of skill structure: a lean, command-driven workflow with genuine two-phase validation, an explicit error-recovery path, and clean one-level-deep progressive disclosure into seven real reference files. The only notable weakness is that the central create-connection step is not self-contained, requiring a hop to a reference to construct the required JSON.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and operational: commands, tables, and gotchas with almost no conceptual padding — e.g. "A connection is a named pipe, not a pipeline" is a two-line scoping statement, not a tutorial. It assumes Claude's competence (no explanation of what Glue or VPCs are), and the one explanatory passage (why Phase B test-connection is insufficient) conveys non-obvious, failure-relevant information. Matches anchor 5's 'every token earns its place' rather than anchor 4's 'minor instances of over-explanation'. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Mostly executable guidance: concrete commands like `aws sts get-caller-identity`, `aws glue get-connections --filter ConnectionType=<TYPE>`, `aws glue test-connection --connection-name <NAME>`, plus per-source hint checklists. However, the core creation step `aws glue create-connection --connection-input '<JSON>'` uses an unresolved placeholder with no inline example of the JSON shape, deferring entirely to the references — a minor gap that fits anchor 4 ('concrete code or commands with minor gaps') rather than anchor 5's copy-paste-ready coverage of common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight clearly sequenced steps with explicit validation: "You MUST test before handing off" with a two-phase check (Phase A `aws glue test-connection`, Phase B engine-level verification), a defined failure route ("On failure in either phase, Step 8"), and an ordered diagnostic procedure with constraints. This matches anchor 5's explicit validation steps and feedback loops for error recovery, not anchor 4's 'minor validation gaps'. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a well-organized overview that routes to seven one-level-deep references, each contextually signaled (source-classification table, per-step links, and a References section with one-line descriptions), and all seven referenced files exist in ./references/. Content is appropriately split (per-source setup details live in the references; routing and orchestration stay inline), matching anchor 5 rather than anchor 4's 'minor organization gaps'. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 19 / 20 Passed |