Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
An exemplarily lean, well-structured skill body with excellent progressive disclosure and a single clear workflow pointer. The weakest area is actionability of the in-body troubleshooting guidance, which names what to check but not how to check it.
Suggestions
Add one concrete command or resource-name pattern per troubleshooting entry (e.g., the CloudWatch log group naming convention `API-Gateway-Execution-Logs_{rest_api_id}/{stage_name}` or the `aws apigateway get-account` check for `cloudwatchRoleArn`) so recovery is executable without opening the reference.
Include a one-line prerequisites note in the body (rest_api_id, deployment_id, stage_name) so required inputs are visible before diving into the procedure.
Link the 'Stage creation fails' and 'WAF blocking legitimate requests' troubleshooting subsections to the relevant sections of the reference procedure for faster navigation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence: a 4-line overview, a two-line pointer to the procedure, and terse troubleshooting entries ("Check REST API ID, deployment ID, IAM permissions, and stage naming conventions") with zero padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows. This matches the 'every token earns its place' anchor; it does not fall to score 4 because there is no over-explanation to trim. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | The create section fully delegates to the referenced procedure (appropriate), but the troubleshooting entries are high-level hints with no commands ("Verify the CloudWatch role permissions, log group existence") — direction without the specific CLI calls or log-group naming to execute. This sits between 'minimal concrete guidance' (2) and 'mostly executable' (4); the executable detail all lives in the reference file rather than the body. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The workflow is clearly signaled ("follow the procedure exactly. See [API Gateway stage creation procedure](references/create-api-gateway-stage.md)"), and the referenced procedure contains validation checkpoints (verify dependencies, validate REST API/deployment existence, stop on failure), with the body's troubleshooting section covering error recovery. Minor gap: the body itself surfaces no validation steps, keeping it below the explicit-checkpoints-in-place anchor of 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a clean overview pointing to one real, well-signaled, one-level-deep reference (references/create-api-gateway-stage.md, verified to exist as a 14KB detailed SOP); no nested references and no content inlined that belongs in a separate file. This matches the top anchor exactly. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |